ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?

[kjander]

When discussing ROI is it standard to refer to your true ROI after rakeback or figure it with the full juice?

I appolgize if this has already been discussed, I could not a thread on it. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[Big Limpin']

without

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
without

[/ QUOTE ]

[skipperbob]

[ QUOTE ]
When discussing ROI is it standard to refer to your true ROI after rakeback or figure it with the full juice?

I appolgize if this has already been discussed, I could not a thread on it. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

2+2 Standard Formula for Calculating/Reporting R.O.I.:

1.) Think of a number that has a nice "ring"; e.g.17%
2.) Tell everyone that you have a 17.2% R.O.I. over 4000 SnG's.
3.) Create a Web-Site & charge for SnG advice
4.) Write a Blog
5.) Dodge any objective test of your R.O.I.-producing ability
6.) Always add twice your imaginary rakeback to total winnings before calculating imaginary R.O.I.

[Nicholasp27]

roi should include rakeback since that is part of your return on investment

however, because not everyone gets rakeback and different people get different %s of rakeback, we don't include it in our figures in order to keep all of them on a standard platform

plus, we are discussing the results of our play and how it goes up and down with different techniques, tilt, variance, etc...while rakeback remains constant