Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2005, 06:47 PM
liucipher liucipher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seat 6, $11s
Posts: 180
Default $11s: back to basics

Want to plug my leaks - afraid I may be playing too weakly. More than "fold/bet" advice, I'm looking to confirm the reasoning.

1.) out of position + only semi-strong holding + crowded pot + blinds are still low = fold?

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) converter

MP1 (t800)
MP2 (t785)
MP3 (t800)
CO (t790)
Button (t980)
Hero (t785)
BB (t800)
UTG (t800)
UTG+1 (t660)
UTG+2 (t800)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls t15, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP3 calls t15, CO calls t15, Button calls t15, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (t87.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 bets t40</font>, CO folds, Button folds, Hero ???

2.) I've been following AleoMagus advice to look for sets w/ TT-. But I have position and I've seen some posts advocating TT raises in that situation. Weak?

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) converter

UTG+2 (t800)
MP1 (t785)
MP2 (t875)
MP3 (t775)
CO (t965)
Hero (t770)
SB (t785)
BB (t800)
UTG (t645)
UTG+1 (t800)

Preflop: Hero is Button with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP1 calls t15, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, CO calls t15, Hero ???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2005, 07:23 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 65
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

In 1., I'm folding. Maybe preflop, if I'm busy on other tables. This hand is just unplayable unless you hit two pair or a set (and you can still go broke with a set of aces).

In 2., I'm calling because of the set value.

Raising either wins you a small pot or often gets you into difficult post-flop situations, because now you have too much invested to let it go with no set and, say, one overcard. You can too easily bleed chips away.

As the blinds rise, this equation changes, and you play the hand faster pre-flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2005, 07:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

Hand #1: I fold pre-flop, specifically to avoid situations like this. Having said that, I probably call here because you're closing the action, and then re-evaluate on the turn, hoping for a free card and folding to a decent bet. I don't think folding is terrible, but if you fold to this flop, you might as well fold pre-flop.

Hand #2: With the deeper stacks at Stars, I'd definitely raise here. But at Party, I probably call and play for set value. I don't think a raise is terrible, but I tend to get myself in trouble c-betting, so I've been limping hands like this more often, looking for good flops.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2005, 08:57 PM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

Fold for 5 chips?! Are you kidding??

FWIW it's close between fold and call on the flop, for me. I'd probably let it go but I wouldn't hate to call then lead the turn.

Second one.. just call.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:07 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 65
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

[ QUOTE ]
Fold for 5 chips?! Are you kidding??


[/ QUOTE ]

I fold with 94o for 5 chips, and I'd rather play that hand than this one multi-way.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:08 PM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

Unbelievable.. well ok fold for 5 chips if you suck at post flop play I guess.. I never would fold for 5 chips with 94o in this situation.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:13 PM
liucipher liucipher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seat 6, $11s
Posts: 180
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

Am I really less than 11:1 to flop 2 pair or better? I only completed with the hopes of winning the lotto against AK or something.

In terms of that hand, I was more curious if I should lead out and see where I stand, because I think stronger aces reraise me.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:21 PM
SCfuji SCfuji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 467
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

hand 1 complete is cool
call the flop donk 1/2 pot on turn/fold to a push

hand 2 raise to t60ish.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:42 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 65
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

[ QUOTE ]
Unbelievable.. well ok fold for 5 chips if you suck at post flop play I guess.. I never would fold for 5 chips with 94o in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh. More attitude for no reason. Grow up.

Look up "reverse implied odds" if you really want to learn something. Add in 5 other tables, and maybe you'll see why it's not at all crystal clear to call, as you seem to think.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:46 PM
psyduck psyduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 235
Default Re: $11s: back to basics

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Unbelievable.. well ok fold for 5 chips if you suck at post flop play I guess.. I never would fold for 5 chips with 94o in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh. More attitude for no reason. Grow up.

Look up "reverse implied odds" if you really want to learn something. Add in 5 other tables, and maybe you'll see why it's not at all crystal clear to call, as you seem to think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you retarded? You're getting like 20:1 to complete, and that's not even factoring in implied odds. I complete with ANY TWO.

We've been through this before.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.