Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2005, 07:37 PM
Karak567 Karak567 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Default Has anyone been playing $55+ buy-ins at the skins?

Rock gardens? Solid? Fishy? Any comments?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2005, 08:00 PM
wuwei wuwei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 3/20/77 winterland
Posts: 287
Default Re: Has anyone been playing $55+ buy-ins at the skins?

The half dozen I've played since the split ($55s) have all been good games. However, they fill up so damn slow I don't have the patience for them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2005, 10:45 PM
AA suited AA suited is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Has anyone been playing $55+ buy-ins at the skins?

i played 2 sets and broke even. not enuf of a sample to determine quality of players.

but it takes 5 min to fill one game. thats why i moved back to Party
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2005, 08:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Has anyone been playing $55+ buy-ins at the skins?

I've played ~100 55s at skins. Still lots of bad players especially during the peak hours. In the daytime players are a bit better and it takes a long time to get tables going.

If you want to multitable only $55 they take too much time to fill up though. I play one $55 and three $33 so I don't have to wait so long and the games seem to be very nice still.

But don't come to my tables! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I'm Lotro at empire.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.