|
|
#1
10-12-2005, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
33 Push?
Standard?
***** Hand History for Game 2866400438 ***** NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:16534889 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) - Wednesday, October 12, 17:00:47 EDT 2005 Table Table 67195 (Real Money) Seat 1 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 1: full_house83 ( $745 ) Seat 2: motts8888 ( $1714 ) Seat 4: dapbowler770 ( $1153 ) Seat 8: helie_lee ( $2403 ) Seat 9: kansas489 ( $1160 ) Seat 10: joshUA81111 ( $825 ) Trny:16534889 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to full_house83 [ 3c 3s ] helie_lee folds. kansas489 folds. joshUA81111 folds. full_house83 is all-In [745] 
|
|
#2
10-12-2005, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
At this level, and your chip stack. And with only 2 more people to act behind you with the others folding... this is definately a push.
Results?
|
|
#4
10-12-2005, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
Yeah I was just thinking that many people around here could make the argument for pushing almost any 2 in that position and the blinds/stack sizes.
|
|
#6
10-12-2005, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
It's funny I keep hoping I post a hand that people say "that is a bad push, you have a leak". But nope I am just running worse than anyone has ever thought possible. At the peak 41 BI drop and right now I am down 36 BI, I'm coming up to a 500 SnG period of losing. This is after 2500 with double digit ROI. The only part of my game that has changed is the amoutn of times I win a hand when i am ahead and a confli pfor me being a 90% underdog. If I am not a winner after this chunk of 1000 SnG's I will take a 1 week break and go back to 4 tabling th 3/6 limit game at least there I only get sucked out for bets and not stacks.
I thought SnG's had low variance, I guess only if you ahve good luck, huh? Out.
|
|
#8
10-12-2005, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
[ QUOTE ]
But nope I am just running worse than anyone has ever thought possible. At the peak 41 BI drop and right now I am down 36 BI, I'm coming up to a 500 SnG period of losing. [/ QUOTE ] This certainly has been thought possible. Do you even read any of the worthwhile posts on this damn forum?!?! [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] I thought SnG's had low variance, I guess only if you ahve good luck, huh? [/ QUOTE ] They do. Suck it up and concentrate on playing the right way. NO HOT CHICKS FOR YOU! Yugoslav
|
|
#9
10-12-2005, 05:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
[ QUOTE ]
I thought SnG's had low variance. [/ QUOTE ] Wrong. They have high variance. Just not as high as no-limit MTTs or ring games.
|
|
#10
10-12-2005, 05:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 33 Push?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] But nope I am just running worse than anyone has ever thought possible. At the peak 41 BI drop and right now I am down 36 BI, I'm coming up to a 500 SnG period of losing. [/ QUOTE ] This certainly has been thought possible. Do you even read any of the worthwhile posts on this damn forum?!?! [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] I thought SnG's had low variance, I guess only if you ahve good luck, huh? [/ QUOTE ] They do. Suck it up and concentrate on playing the right way. NO HOT CHICKS FOR YOU! Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] I was being srcastic although a 40 BI downswing is at least notable from what I have seen on this forum. I do want to thank you for being hard on me as I need the encouragment. I just read Fiery Justice's blog post where he talks about going 1000 $215's with a negative ROI and that has given me motivation. Also I saw that Zeejustin had a 40 BI drop during his 1000 215's challenege. So just for you Yugo, I will not mention my downswing again until it hits 60 BI or I ahve gone 1000 SnG's with a negative ROI. Please poker gods, quit rewarding the guys who are TRYING to give me their chips. Holler. Out.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
