Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:44 AM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

I'm tired. I'm going to bed, but just so I can sleep well, please tell me this is not a push.

Seat 2: Bob_Sakamano (885)
Seat 5: Jilex (4395)
Seat 6: pateac (1050)
Seat 8: playtitleist (1670)
Jilex posts small blind (150)
pateac posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to playtitleist [ 5h, 5c ]
playtitleist
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:49 AM
caretaker1 caretaker1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 73
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

SNGPT says yes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:52 AM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

yes it is, or yes it's not (a push that is)?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:54 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

This looks like a pretty clear push to me unless either the big stack or the BB will call too much. And by calling too much, I mean down into weak queen/jacks for the big stack and like any two for the BB.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:58 AM
caretaker1 caretaker1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 73
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

Sorry. Yes it is a push, even against slightly looser standards.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:59 AM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

Thanks. Like the answer or not, I can sleep now.

Peace out all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2005, 11:39 AM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

[ QUOTE ]

Seat 5: Jilex (4395)
Seat 6: pateac (1050)
Seat 8: playtitleist (1670)
Jilex posts small blind (150)
pateac posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to playtitleist [ 5h, 5c ]
playtitleist

[/ QUOTE ]

Now that I am awake, I actually did want to get some feedback on this hand. Here were my considerations:

For push:
- Small stack not small enough to get blinded out this orbit
- I get the BB next so my pre-flop position will suck the next two hands
- Neither small stack likely to call without big hand as they try to outlast each other
- If Biggy calls and loses he loses his big edge he really seemed to be enjoying
- probably have the best hand anyway

Against push:
- I made a play much earlier in the SNG that I am certain Big Stack remembers
- Big Stack has been on a wide range

SNGPT says push. I pushed. I am more interested in finding out if my for/against logic makes sense.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:02 PM
downtown downtown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 33
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

[ QUOTE ]

Against push:
- I made a play much earlier in the SNG that I am certain Big Stack remembers
- Big Stack has been on a wide range

[/ QUOTE ]

To a degree you only know this because presumably big stack called you. You can account for both these cases though by widening the range that you put the big stacks call on in SNGPT. So it may make the push worse, but if it's +EV enough, it's been accounted for.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:10 PM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: $22 PP - bubble UTG with 55

[ QUOTE ]

To a degree you only know this because presumably big stack called you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Called me on the earlier hand? No, but there was plenty of chat about that hand for a while. I got the wide range info based on the calls he had made knocking out #5 and #6.

But, I see your point.

Since you answered, any thought on my reason's For push? I'm afraid there might be a leak in there if I am putting too much credence on one or more of them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.