BB Tiny stack

[Olback]

$22

Does anyone fold here? I figure i have 2 live cards no FE so why not call and gamble here.

#Game No : 2799024489
***** Hand History for Game 2799024489 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:16192266 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) - Friday, September 30, 00:19:09 EDT 2005
Table Table 13810 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: djnate2001 ( $1295 )
Seat 2: DEVILDOGSD ( $1205 )
Seat 3: smoothmaniac ( $422 )
Seat 4: Rough_Trade ( $1380 )
Seat 5: babytimebomb ( $1390 )
Seat 7: bigern62 ( $714 )
Seat 8: noLIMit17 ( $420 )
Seat 9: dadin ( $684 )
Seat 10: Olback1 ( $490 )
Trny:16192266 Level:5
Blinds(75/150)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Olback1 [ 3d 7h ]
>You have options at Table 13942 Table!.
djnate2001 raises [300].
DEVILDOGSD folds.
smoothmaniac is all-In [422]
Rough_Trade folds.
babytimebomb folds.
bigern62 folds.
noLIMit17 folds.
dadin folds.
>You have options at Table 13942 Table!.
>You have options at Table 14520 Table!.
Your time bank will become active in less than 20 seconds. If you do not want it to be used, please act now.
Olback1 will be using his time bank for this hand.
Olback1 is all-In [340]

[Olback]

Anyone have any opinions?

With 9 people in at level five, your short stack is going to have to get lucky to make the money. Your are getting decent pot odds here, so you might as well go for the double up. 9 left in a 22 at level five, I think the table probably has been playing too tight and you should have loosened your game up a bit at the earlier levels. In a regular 22 a strong case can be made against this, but this table looks like it might've been one where a more aggressive strategy would have been very effective.