Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2005, 12:34 PM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

Seat 3: playtitleist (4814)
Seat 5: DontYouCry (2221)
Seat 6: ricoguy (965)
ricoguy posts small blind (150)
playtitleist posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to playtitleist [ Jd, Kd ]
DontYouCry raises (2221) to 2221
DontYouCry is all-In.
ricoguy calls (815)
ricoguy is all-In.
playtitleist can’t fold

My possible outcomes:
playtitleist has best hand: game over

Rico has best hand:
- DYC beats me -> Rico 2895, DYC 2512, play 2593
- I beat DYC -> Rico 2895, play 5105

DYC has best hand:
- DYC 5407, play 2593

Rico eliminated with anything other than best hand. I think KJs is good enough here. I can't even tell what is the worst case here. DYC wins and I am down ~2:1? But, I've wrapped up 2nd and the blinds sizes make it such that 2593 is not such a bad position.

Gotta call it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2005, 12:50 PM
bluefeet bluefeet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: galapagos islands of course
Posts: 825
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

I feelya, but without evening offering an opinion yet, consider two other scenarios:

- you fold

DYC wins, you go HU, up 4514:3486

Rico wins, you continue to build your pre-HU stack up 4514:1256:2230

eh, I don't know. I see your point, but the two most likely results in your scenerios is holding 2k+ chips, either as a 2:1 dog HU, or back equal stacked 3 handed.

I'm thinking I like either of my two "gaurenteed" 4514 scenerios better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2005, 01:29 PM
jedinite jedinite is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

I agree - either you go in to HU with the chiplead or you get to keep your position as table captain.

At the $11 level i'd let this pass, at higher levels I can see where I might lean towards a call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2005, 01:55 PM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

[ QUOTE ]
At the $11 level i'd let this pass, at higher levels I can see where I might lean towards a call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure I know why you would say this. I would think DYC's range is much tighter at the higher levels ($33 and above). Making it LESS of a chance I can win this pot and take down tourney now.

The more I think about it, I tend to agree with both of you, no real gain from calling beyond the off chance I can beat them both. But, I like the play if I held AJs instead of KJs. At what level would you call with AJs?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2005, 02:59 PM
jedinite jedinite is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

At higher levels, if I had a read on the player as a smart agressive player its more likely that he's making this move on the bubble (thanks to the microstacks) with a much wider range - probably as wide as any two, unless he knows for sure you're calling with anything (i.e. you've posted 2/3 your stack as the BB) - and then its probably as wide as, say 70%

I don't know that its enough to make me call this just because my broadway is sooooted, you'd have to run ICM against a reasonable hand range.

I was mostly trying to say at the $11 its more likely that you're up against something you don't want to run out against, compared to a higher level where you might suspect the original raiser is making a move with almost any two.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2005, 03:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

I would fold, because I'm pretty confident that I can either steal more or find a better spot. If rico wins, then I can steal a LOT more because they'll be nearly tied in chips. If the other guy wins, then I'll be heads-up with a decent chip lead and I'll be happy with that. KJ is just so easily dominated, and if it's dominated by DYC then I'd be in a world of trouble because there's a nice chance for rico to win and then lose to DYC too.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2005, 03:28 PM
tshort tshort is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

I'm going to assume the following ranges for these calculations:

Assume button is pushing with 30% of logical pushing hands.

Assume SB is calling with 19% of logical calling hands.

This means I'm assuming a standard $11 player. If you had a different read these ranges would likely be wider and potentially a little tighter if they suck.

You have 6 outcomes:

Calling outcomes:

1) Win entire pot.

Result: 8000, 0, 0

$EV: 16.5

2) SB wins main pot. You win side pot.

$EV: 8.12

3) SB wins main pot. Button wins side pot.

$EV: 5.95

4) Button wins entire pot.

$EV: 11.3

Total Calling $EV: 41.5

Folding outcomes:

5) Buttons wins pot.

$EV: 17.4

6) SB wins pot.

$EV: 22.1

Total Folding $EV: 39.5

With standard reads, I would call. If you thought either or both players were tight/very tight then I would fold. If either/both players are loose I would call. If button is loose I would call regardless of SB read (I would like the idea of being heads up against SB if he is tight).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2005, 04:20 PM
playtitleist playtitleist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: No mo\' parachutes
Posts: 96
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

Thanks for the analysis. I did put button on a wide range, coming off a somewhat bad beat, which is why I called it.

I made the call. I was relatively happy with the outcome, but not particularly happy with the play. Thus the post.

I think it's very much read specific. Without reads, it's a gamble - not horrible, not good. I tend to lean to the "gamble for first, settle for third" line at the $11s. With reads, if button is tight at all, KJs is not good enough to call it.

Thanks for the responses.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2005, 05:25 PM
Sykes Sykes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 231
Default Re: PP $11 - ITM. Can\'t not call this. Right?

Depending if button has been stealing alot, his hand ranges can be superwide especially knowing that you can't call without a decent hand.

So, he could have any 2 cards here or he could be a tight-wad.

Let's say his hand range is:

22+, A2+, Any 2 broadway, T9/J9/Q9/K9

And let's say shortstacks calling range is:

55+, A7+, QJ/KT/KJ/KQ+

I would think you should have enough equity to call with KJs profitable.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.