Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2005, 08:47 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Checking some stuff re: RoR

Normal Distribution of Hourly Rate

[ QUOTE ]
Bankroll needed = -(standard deviation^2/2*avg, win per hour)ln(the risk you are willing to accept).


[/ QUOTE ]

Plugging in some numbers:

SD: 15 bb/100
WR: 2 bb/100
RoR: 0.1%

You'd need 388 bb....

---------------------------------

Questions:

1) Is this correct (the formula)?

2) Is this correct (the result)?

3) Can I use bb/100 and sd/100 in this formula?

Edit: At 1% Risk of Ruin, you'd only need 225 bb.

Edit: At 3.5 bb/100 and 0.1% RoR, you'd be looking again at requiring only 225 bb... So it obviously becomes much less risky as you have a higher winrate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2005, 09:09 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Re: Checking some stuff re: RoR

from some earlier post

Also, am I correct to assume that the two formulas are the same, just that one isolates B and the other isolates r?

B = -(sigma^2/2u)ln(r)
r = exp(-2uB/sigma^2)

------

Is this the formula that I should be using?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2005, 09:13 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Re: Checking some stuff re: RoR

[ QUOTE ]
from some earlier post

Also, am I correct to assume that the two formulas are the same, just that one isolates B and the other isolates r?

B = -(sigma^2/2u)ln(r)
r = exp(-2uB/sigma^2)

------

Is this the formula that I should be using?

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, I'm laughing at myself now.

These are the same formula, with the exception of slightly different terminology and one being more compact since it's written in math symbols).

However, I'm glad I found the post still, because it had isolated for ROR instead of bankroll as well...

I guess these are correct... but someone please give me a "yep" if the third question is on the money too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2005, 01:50 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Re: Checking some stuff re: RoR

bump... #3 is the important one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2005, 02:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Checking some stuff re: RoR

Just want to point out that you may be the only poster in the history of 2+2 to reply to yourself three times before anyone else does. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Also wanted to save you from #4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.