Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2002, 01:31 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lord of the Rings review



Just saw it at last.


Amazing cinematography. Great direction. But, an hour too long and far too horrific for an under 10 to watch.


Cheers,


Keith
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2002, 07:37 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lord of the Rings review



needed to be about 3 hours longer... if you've read the books, you'll know why. other than that, i loved it. ive seen it 5 times already...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2002, 08:35 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lord of the Rings review



I loved it. I think I would have loved it as an eight-year-old. Younger than that might be iffy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2002, 08:06 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Lord of the Rings review



I think it would be impossible to do it justice in a 3 (or maybe even 6) hour movie. This really needed to have the same kind of time allotted to something like Roots in a TV mini-series in order to hope to do it reasonable justice.


By the way, I thought the orc-chieftain was simply awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2002, 04:54 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default lurtz was damn cool...



i said 6 as a loose example. it truly should take a long ass time to do the books right, but i think peter jackson and crew did a really great job with everything. you could tell they put their hearts into the movie to make it good. they geek hard.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.