Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2005, 06:31 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mistake in Poker Essays Vol. II (first editions, second printing)

Somehow I was able to find a copy of this elusive title at a local Borders. I noticed a fairly obvious mistake in the essay "A note on Starting Omaha hands" (Pg. 84-85). It's so obvious that I felt I must be missing something, and showed it to several friends who were able to confirm it.

He writes:

Suppose you have
A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
and now you play it. Now on fourth street the board is

J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
....Now notice that if the board pairs you can lose to a full house or four-of-a-kind, if a spade comes you can lose to a flush, and if a nine or a ten falls, you can also lose to a higher straight.

As you can see though, while a nine would cause you to possibly lose to a Jack-high straight, a ten would in fact give you a Jack-high straight, and it would be the nuts.

Of course, I agree with the premise that you are in a vulnerable situation with this hand, but I'm quite suprised that this made to print.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2005, 07:04 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Mistake in Poker Essays Vol. II (first editions, second printing)

Hi Akias:

It looks like you're correct. Unfortunately, the next printing has already been completed.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2005, 07:27 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Mistake in Poker Essays Vol. II (first editions, second printing)

Are you serious? You're actually printing this a third time?!

I've been in probably a hundred or so bookstores up and down the East Coast, and while I've seen Volumes 1 and 3 stocked on countless shelves, I have only seen Volume 2 stocked once. While I do enjoy the book and find that it has topics that aren't discussed elsewhere in poker literature, I can't help but wonder is it really being shipped out at a rate which requires multiple printings?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2005, 08:09 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Mistake in Poker Essays Vol. II (first editions, second printing)

Hi Alias:

We have sold over 6,000 copies of Volume II, and while that's very small compared to some of our other books, it is enough to warrant another small printing. Also we have sold, as of today, 986 copies of it this year, which already makes it the best year ever. (For a comparison, both Harrington books should sell over 100,000 copies during their first 12 months.)

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.