Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2005, 08:23 PM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default 109 77 Bubble Hand

My read is that we all played the bubble well

His range is wide, but not any two

***** Hand History for Game 2666006968 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $100 Buy-in + $9 Entry Fee Trny:15506253 Level:8 Blinds(200/400) - Tuesday, September 06, 19:11:53 EDT 2005
Table Table 12035 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: TheLage ( $2685 )
Seat 3: The_Lobo ( $1825 )
Seat 4: AAKKAKAK ( $2920 )
Seat 10: edand888 ( $2570 )
Trny:15506253 Level:8
Blinds(200/400)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to TheLage [ 7s 7d ]
The_Lobo is all-In [1825]
AAKKAKAK folds.
edand888 folds.
Your time bank will become active in less than 20 seconds. If you do not want it to be used, please act now.
TheLage ???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2005, 08:33 PM
J-Lo J-Lo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

the advantage of being the agressor....

only reason i WOULDN'T call is because stack sizes are so close to one another that u can push and have other fold MANY MANY hands-- however, i'd assume others know this too

otherwise, u describe UTG as loose..... AND he seems to be rather desperate w/ 4.5x BB left-- call and hope u catch him w/ A2 or one undercard.... GL
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2005, 08:34 PM
Newt_Buggs Newt_Buggs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego, the $50s
Posts: 760
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

My initial reaction was call, and then I ran the numbers and found out that folding would be horrible.

Are you thinking that there's something here that ICM grossly miscounts?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2005, 08:47 PM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

[ QUOTE ]

Are you thinking that there's something here that ICM grossly miscounts?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

my FE
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-06-2005, 10:12 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

[ QUOTE ]
My initial reaction was call, and then I ran the numbers and found out that folding would be horrible.

Are you thinking that there's something here that ICM grossly miscounts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hahahaha. Knowing Degen, this question is very very funny.

Degen, unfortunately this is very much a pot odds v FE question v waiting longer v how is the table playing question v table read.

Pot Odds: I'm sure most would agree that your are likely a 55% favorite against villain's range. Pot odds are giving you 1.70:1 to call, meaning you need to win this hand more than 37% of the time to make this a profitable decision. So you know the important poker decision.

Waiting Longer: Folding here makes you the new shortstack, but not by much, and not overly significant. The real benefit to folding here is whether you think that on the next hand, if folded to you, do you think your opponents would fold a similar or less strength hand to your push/raise.

How is the table playing? Usually this is THE determining factor. If the table has been playing very tight, and hero has rebuilt his stack through many steals in the past, there is some merit to folding here. Some of the problems are that now that pot odds are always going to be so compelling, folds you may have seen in the past with say 44, are now more likely calls. Furthermore, are blinds changing soon?

Table Read: Usually, an UTG push generally reflects strength. I think that read can be reduced here because of the size of the blinds. But if you have a Tight read here on villain, enough for you to eliminate the position read above, and that you could significantly reduce the hand range so that you are no longer 50/50 against his range...

Anyway, Degen, I hate calling here. But I'm certain I'd do it.

I just ran this through SGA. It's really tough to pass up some hugely positive +$EV situations. Here are the results.

Aggressive: 44+, A7s, A9o, KJs+
$EV diff. +0.3%
Loose: 22+, A2s+, A3o+, KTs+, KJo+, QJs
$EV diff. +2.4%
Maniac: 22+,A2+,K2+,Q2s+,Q6o+,J7s+,J9o+,T8s+,98s
$EV diff. +3.1%

For me, Loose is precisely the range I'd put him on.

Here's a thought. How big And how small does your stack have to be here for you to call?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-06-2005, 10:16 PM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

wow nice analysis

i call if i have less than 3 BB's for sure, i definately fold if he is the other big stack and we both have over 4k for sure...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-06-2005, 10:52 PM
ChuckNorris ChuckNorris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 54
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

[ QUOTE ]
Waiting Longer: Folding here makes you the new shortstack, but not by much, and not overly significant. The real benefit to folding here is whether you think that on the next hand, if folded to you, do you think your opponents would fold a similar or less strength hand to your push/raise.

How is the table playing? Usually this is THE determining factor. If the table has been playing very tight, and hero has rebuilt his stack through many steals in the past, there is some merit to folding here. Some of the problems are that now that pot odds are always going to be so compelling, folds you may have seen in the past with say 44, are now more likely calls. Furthermore, are blinds changing soon?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not only about how good FE Degen has when pushing. If he is correct about the table playing the bubble well, the pots will often be raised when the action gets to him, and he can't count on getting much if any good steal opportunities. That's a big part of the reason why you can't pass this kind of an edge in CEV here. An interesting situation, and I'd probably need to use my timebank, but after thinking about if for 30 secs, its' definately a call.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-06-2005, 11:11 PM
Michael C. Michael C. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 136
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

I agree that the fact that the others are playing the bubble well would be the deciding factor. At a passive/tight table I'd fold and save my fe. But if others are raising and understand the gap, I'd likely make my stand here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-06-2005, 11:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

I fold...at this point with my stack size...I don't want to lose it on a coin flip.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2005, 11:22 PM
Scuba Chuck Scuba Chuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 1-table tournaments
Posts: 1,537
Default Re: 109 77 Bubble Hand

[ QUOTE ]
I fold...at this point with my stack size...I don't want to lose it on a coin flip.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmmmm....

Wow.....

Do you think there are any flaws with this statement????
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.