settle an argument

[sng-sam]

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t100 (7 handed) converter

Hero (t450)
CO (t1745)
Button (t1145)
SB (t1702)
BB (t1000)
UTG (t1256)
MP1 (t702)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].

Hero is all in 450
SB: folds
BB: types "3 to 1"
BB: types "?"
UTG types "go for it"
BB: folds "not enough money"

Final Pot: t150

after the hand:
Hero: "not 3 to 1"
Villan: "350 to get 900"
Hero: "you can't include your 350 in your calculation"
Villan: "of course you include your money...its part of the pot...pot odds"
Hero: "whatever you might check later"
Villan: " dont need to"

Ok so am I such a big donkey that all this time I'm a winning player who can't calculate pot odds? Please I might slit my wrists soon over this one.

SAM

PS. If I'm right. I can't explain why I eduacted the fish If I'm wrong it was a purposeful campaign of misinformation [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

pps: I went on to win the tourny "ship it"

[Rduke55]

???
350 to get 600.

[Lloyd]

1.7 to 1 odds - 600 / 350 - total in pot prior to calling / how much to call.

Don't educate.

[sng-sam]

ok I feel so much better now. I was beginning to question my whole existence. As for educating the fish I know better but I'm a compulsive person (duh I gamble) and I couldn't resist.

This definitly makes me glad I moved up to $30+3's

SAM

Man, you guys just missed a great opportunity to play with this guy's mind.