Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

I need some people to yell at me for this; discussion also would be okay.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t20 (8 handed) converter

SB (t1480)
Hero (t2670)
UTG (t700)
UTG+1 (t1410)
MP1 (t1460)
MP2 (t1490)
CO (t1340)
Button (t2950)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP1 calls t20, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to t40</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls t20, MP1 calls t20.

Flop: (t130) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets t60</font>, Hero calls t60, MP1 calls t60.

Turn: (t310) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets t200</font>, Button folds, Hero calls t200.

River: (t710) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets t1160 (All-In)</font>, Hero calls t1160.

Final Pot: t3030
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:04 AM
HesseJam HesseJam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

OK, so I would have gone all-in on the flop but I am not any good.

I might have folded to the 200 bet on the turn but probably I wouldn't have.

I sure would have called the all-in on the flop
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:05 AM
nyc999 nyc999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 102
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

You need to define your hand at some point -- what did you put the villain on?

Nice river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:09 AM
se2schul se2schul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 167
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

I'd push the flop.
Did he have 2 hearts?
I'd also move up to the $11s since they aren't really any harder than the $5s.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:10 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

[ QUOTE ]
You need to define your hand at some point -- what did you put the villain on?

Nice river.

[/ QUOTE ]

I put the original raiser on an ace, probably with a lower kicker (maybe two pair), but it's certainly possible that he had a PP and was taking a shot. To be honest, I just didn't consider the possibility of an overcall on the flop. When he did, I thought I'd priced him on for a flush draw.

On the turn, I thought I was beat but got suspicious given the action (I don't expect a bet here from a made flush often at my stakes), so I called to reevaluate on the river.

On the river, I thought there's no way that bet wanted a call, and I had aces up.

Looking back, I'm not sure anything after the flop was +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:12 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

[ QUOTE ]
I'd push the flop.
Did he have 2 hearts?
I'd also move up to the $11s since they aren't really any harder than the $5s.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's a good idea to try and ignore his actual hand. His range is what I'm curious about, and I'm not sure what it is. I play the 5s and not the 11s mainly because I'm a pussy who likes this game and hates losing money to variance/dumb plays like these.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

I think this is an excellent situation to check-raise the flop. You are out of position and at the button's mercy with a good but vulnerable flop. Without a read, his range of hands for a button min. raise are huge. I hate min. raises - they confuse me because I never make them.

Check-calling gives you NO info. You could have him badly beat, he could have AK, he could be continuation betting with a flush draw or even protecting a set with two hearts on board. Check-raising makes him the confused one and may just win you the pot right there.

That being said, if he calls, I slow down when the scary heart hits the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2005, 10:33 AM
Hornacek Hornacek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 43
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

[ QUOTE ]
I might have folded to the 200 bet on the turn but probably I wouldn't have.

[/ QUOTE ]
I find that statement incredibly funny.

I would have c/r'ed the flop. Maybe 2.5x his bet, to see where he's at. If he pushes, time to make a decision!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:44 AM
se2schul se2schul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 167
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

[ QUOTE ]

I think it's a good idea to try and ignore his actual hand. His range is what I'm curious about, and I'm not sure what it is. I play the 5s and not the 11s mainly because I'm a pussy who likes this game and hates losing money to variance/dumb plays like these.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, because it's a $5, the range for him making a small raise is pretty wide. Lots of players will play any ace, any face card, any suited, any connectors etc like this. They'll usually play hands like AA KK QQ or AK either very strong or very weak (sandbagging), so I'd eliminate those from his range 99% of the time. I'd say you're often ahead on this flop. Make a big bet, checkraise big, or push.

BTW, with the amount of posting/reading you do, you're well ahead of 90% of the players on party for the $5 and $10 games. If you can beat the $5s easily (which I assume you can), then it would almost certainly be more profitable to move up. BTW, I was very cautious with my BR. I played the $5s forever and eventually moved to the $11s. It took me forever to move to the $22s because I was affraid that there would be a huge jump in skill and I didn't want to get pummelled. I've finally made it to the $33s (long overdue) and I wish that I had made the move sooner. You can only take your game so far playing such low limits.

If you could play $7.25 tournaments would you? I ask because you don't have to play either the $5s or the $10s exclusively - you could do a mix, say play 1 $10 for every 3 $5s

(3*$6+$11)/4 = $7.25 avg buy-in per tourney

After you get 50 $10s under your belt, you'll probably be surprised at how easy they are.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-01-2005, 11:58 AM
Tailgunner Tailgunner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: Embarassingly Butchered AQ Hand

Well, since all his chips wound up in the pot I imagine he either had 53 or KJ. Your hand wasn't a monster and you're OOP, so I can't really fault you for not re-raising preflop.

I'd probably want to see where I stood with top pair/second kicker and pushed off the draws with a re-raise on the flop. Keep in mind that in low levels of tournies even though a bet may break the odds a lot of players will continue to draw since the pots are so small. You often really need to punish them to drive them off.

With both a possible straight and flush on the board and not even holding top kicker (especially if I had shown some strength earlier in the hand) I would fold to this all-in on the river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.