Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2005, 11:57 PM
C-Dog C-Dog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Default Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

Villain is new to the table, and hasnt done anything out of the ordinary.

Is the river a bet/fold situation? I figured that he had 2 pair, or maybe a set of 3s, and that I had sucked out on him on the turn.

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: (4 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls, Button calls, SB folds.

Turn: (3.50 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, Button folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG caps</font>, Hero calls.

River: (11.50 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 15.50 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2005, 12:17 AM
Sakuraba Sakuraba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 48
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

What is his hand range for calling preflop UTG. It is really hard to put him on a range of hands withough knowing if he plays hands like Q3, Q7, J3, J7, or 73 UTG.

Without knowing that, bet folding the river would be absolutely terrible. He could easily have Q3 or Q7 and you would be folding the best hand. Also, if he has something that you beat, he is almost always going to bet anything that he would have called with anyway. Bet/folding is not better then check/calling if you are ahead or behind.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2005, 12:40 AM
C-Dog C-Dog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

I have problems putting people on UTG limp hands. Since i never do it, I am not sure what the average unknown would do it with. Also, I tend to think that anyone wo UTG limps is pretty bad, so I would lean toward a small pair, or any two suited cards. Is there a general range people put on unknown UTG limpers?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2005, 12:43 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

Preflop: standard

Flop: good

Turn: Good, but after he caps your plan should be to call/call for the showdown.


River: Check/call


Adam
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2005, 12:55 AM
Sakuraba Sakuraba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 48
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

You said he was new to the table, but did not do anything out of the ordinary. I just saw the second part, so I thought you had some read on him.

In general, you don't need to put him on any particular hand. You just have to determine if he is loose enough to limp with random junk like Q7 or not. If he wouldn't play a hand, you can take it out of the range that he could have.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2005, 01:26 AM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: standard

Flop: good

Turn: Good, but after he caps your plan should be to call/call for the showdown.


River: Check/call


Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

What sort of hand range would you put him on after the turn cap, Adam?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2005, 01:33 AM
C-Dog C-Dog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

Are you advocating a check/fold instead of a check/call. I was thinking the most likely holding is an inferior 2 Pair, or maybe 33.

C-Dog
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2005, 01:42 AM
wackjob wackjob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

Listen to Adam, he is right on.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2005, 09:44 AM
Redd Redd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

[ QUOTE ]
Are you advocating a check/fold instead of a check/call. I was thinking the most likely holding is an inferior 2 Pair, or maybe 33.

C-Dog

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, I'm definitely showing down. I was just trying to estimate our river equity.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2005, 10:08 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Standard, or overzealous value bet attempt

I would play the hand like u. Bet the river with the intention of calling a raise. He could have 77, 33 or a worse 2-pair. I could even put him on AA. But your hand is good enough very often. So u got to call
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.