#1
|
|||
|
|||
keeping em in on a scary board
terrible LAG (60/25/1.5) opens from the button, I call in the SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 70/15/1/45 wtsd calls in the BB
flop K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 players, 3 BB) I bet, BB calls getting 7-1, button raises, I call, BB calls getting 11-1 turn 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 players, 6 BB) I bet, BB folds, button raises, I 3-bet I think it's ok to do this with KJ. is it ok to do it with AA? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
I think it's definitely ok with KJ, I'm not sure about AA, but why wouldn't you 3-bet pf in either case? I can see the argument for just calling with each hand respectively but not both.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
I don't get the preflop call. BB will call a 3-bet often and against 2 seemingly terrible players I don't see the point of being deceptive.
I don't get the flop call. You're letting BB call profitable with gut-shots and pairs. EDIT: my comments are regarding AA... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
I do not understand the preflop call, can you explain that?
after that, I think it's a fine line with both. your stop and go with a twotone board looks like a split pair of kings or jacks, so even a tag will raise this turn with as little as KQ. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
Hey Josh,
Your hand is so misrepresented you have to 3-bet and call a cap IMO. Preflop I really don't get as well. This is the ideal sort of player to 3-bet against because you'll often earn yourself a lot more action. Rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
[ QUOTE ]
You're letting BB call profitable with gut-shots and pairs. [/ QUOTE ] maybe on the last call he can, but overall he got 5:1 odds to see the turn so it's not like he's making money calling with those hands here. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
[ QUOTE ]
maybe on the last call he can, but overall he got 5:1 odds to see the turn so it's not like he's making money calling with those hands here. [/ QUOTE ] This reasoning is flawed, right? He's not making money, but if we can put him in one more unprofitable situation we should, no? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop I really don't get as well. This is the ideal sort of player to 3-bet against because you'll often earn yourself a lot more action. [/ QUOTE ] because there's a moron in the BB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] maybe on the last call he can, but overall he got 5:1 odds to see the turn so it's not like he's making money calling with those hands here. [/ QUOTE ] This reasoning is flawed, right? He's not making money, but if we can put him in one more unprofitable situation we should, no? [/ QUOTE ] absolutely, the tradeoff is to wait for the turn and possibly get 2bbs out of him. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: keeping em in on a scary board
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's definitely ok with KJ, I'm not sure about AA, but why wouldn't you 3-bet pf in either case? I can see the argument for just calling with each hand respectively but not both. [/ QUOTE ] I kind of combined 2 hands. I don't remember what happened preflop with KJ but I flopped top 2 against a LAG and the asme idiot in the BB. I might've called KJo from the BB against a LAG UTG or UTG+1 raise. both hands happened this morning and I think both had a KJ. I didn't remember what happened so I turned it into one hand, but the concept was the same. keep em in even if they could have outs because they probably don't. with AA I don't think the BB is folding anything with outs anyway, so I'd ratehr keep him in in the event that he has absolutely nothing |
|
|