Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:29 AM
smokylosecannon smokylosecannon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Default 96s FLDR vs Large Field

Button is a fish vp40/pfr0, but no read on other players.
any opinion???



Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 max, 10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls.

Flop: (12.50 SB) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, Hero calls, UTG calls $2.75 (All-In), UTG+1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, Button calls, Hero calls.

Turn: (10.87 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (12.87 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls.

Final Pot: 16.87 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:36 AM
hemstock hemstock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: 96s FLDR vs Large Field

SB folded. Do you mean Button?
You had the odds to call till the river so your calls are fine. The river though, I'm not sure about the check-raise. If the guy has AA (which is possible the way he played his hand) he's gonna 3-bet you. And that would be really unplesant. I think you should LEAD with a bet on the river a call a raise.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:39 AM
ThaHero ThaHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles and .25/.50 on PS
Posts: 199
Default Re: 96s FLDR vs Large Field

I actually might fold this, but with so many opponents I guess calling wouldn't be so bad.

I'd be tempted to bet this flop for value and hope it calls all the way around to button who raises. The pot is so huge I guess you had the odds to call 2 cold.

You really got lucky here. Turn is a check/call.

River isn't so bad either since he has shown the most aggression and will likely bet here.

You really got lucky(or unlucky if you ran into AT or AA).

Edit: Think I might agree with hemstock. Betting is probably better since a check through is bad and a 3 bet is also bad.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:41 AM
hemstock hemstock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: 96s FLDR vs Large Field

Yes you could also bet the flop first.
Folding a flush draw is a really really bad idea.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:42 AM
ThaHero ThaHero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles and .25/.50 on PS
Posts: 199
Default Re: 96s FLDR vs Large Field

I meant folding pre-flop lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2005, 04:45 AM
hemstock hemstock is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: 96s FLDR vs Large Field

[ QUOTE ]
I meant folding pre-flop lol

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's fine. Suited 2-gap connector with 5 opponents already in for one bet is an easy call from the BB.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.