#1
|
|||
|
|||
set on river, but 4 to a straight
only have 6 hands on villain, he hasn't done anything special so far
PokerRoom 0.50/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop: eviljeff is UTG+1 with T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">eviljeff raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>. Flop: (5.50 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">eviljeff bets</font>, MP3 calls. Turn: (3.75 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">eviljeff bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP3 raises</font>. I think this is a pretty easy call, anyone fold or 3bet? River: (6.75 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> eviljeff ... I'm thinking b/c or c/r/c ... which is better? anyone suggest a different line? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
I'm not too worried about the straight, but I'd be worried that your villain might. So I'd just go ahead and bet here.
If he raises you've got a decision to make -- his turn play represented a J more than the straight (unless he had specifically T8). So a 3-bet might not be a bad idea if you can muster up the courage. You'll definitely get called by J9, AJ, etc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
I would probably fold the turn. I would put villain on at least 2 pair here most of the time. I think the river is a good place to bet-call. I'd hate to get this checked through with a set and I think 4 to a straight on the board scares a lot of players.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not too worried about the straight, but I'd be worried that your villain might. So I'd just go ahead and bet here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
I'm usually bet/calling here.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
You really put villian on at least 2 pair every time a turn bet is raised HU?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
MP3 is raising on the turn, to me it looks like he has either a pair of J's or has hit 2 pair (J9 is common).
I doubt, unless he is a tricksy little one he would bet out on an open ended straight. At this level most people will wait until they land them to start going crazy. I would bet out on the river, most of the time I think he'll be calling. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
[ QUOTE ]
You really put villian on at least 2 pair every time a turn bet is raised HU? [/ QUOTE ] No. But the pot is small. We need to be ahead about 25% of the time to warrant a calldown (8:2). We're not good that often in my experience. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
I do agree that even if villian has a J we're now in bad shape. I just don't see how we can specifically think he has 2 pair as opposed to any J.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set on river, but 4 to a straight
[ QUOTE ]
I do agree that even if villian has a J we're now in bad shape. I just don't see how we can specifically think he has 2 pair as opposed to any J. [/ QUOTE ] You're right, I think putting villian on 2 pair is a hasty move. Interestingly enough though, we have a lot more outs against most 2 pairs than we do against a J. I still don't think that I would call the turn. |
|
|