Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2005, 11:01 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default PS 45-player slumming- standard or lunacy?

after apologizing to my beloved swivel chair following my most recent 11 buy-in drop, i settled in to playing a series of $1.20 45-player SNGs on Stars to focus on some basics and my longer range game. psychologically, i've been able to put all the bad beats and misfortunes by the wayside mostly because i've been focusing alot of energy on my 9-2-5, not playing much poker, and posting on 2+2. although i've only played in three 45-players recently, i've placed in the top 5 in all three. this is a hand from one that i don't like, but then i think, how much of a choice did i have?

3-handed, blinds 600/1200, ante 75.

both of the bigger stacks have played a pretty good game but i've had more experience playing against big stack#1 through the tournament. most of what i've seen from big stack#2 has been at the final 9 table but he's done his thing well enough. i felt this was a good blind stealing oppurtunity because #1 saw me show down winning hands throughout the tourney and gave me respect on several raising hands. my problem was #2 with the monstrous stack who had'nt seen me play as much.

big stack#1: 16882 after posting 1200 BB and 75 ante [?]
Hero: 5790 after posting 75 ante 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
big stack#2: 43403 after posting 600 SB and 75 ante [?]

Hero pushes 5790 all-in.

Comments.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2005, 04:04 PM
MonkeeMan MonkeeMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 0
Default Re: PS 45-player slumming- standard or lunacy?

Looks to be a routine push here, as you are quickly losing fold equity. Worst case, you come in 3rd, which is where you are headed w/o pushing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2005, 04:58 PM
jon462 jon462 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: PS 45-player slumming- standard or lunacy?

i think you have just about 0 FE here, esp from the BB.
I probably fold and call a push from BB if you have a face cards, pair, or 2 cards above a 6 [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Really though, you are so outchipped by both of them i dont think blind stealing is gonna get you where you need to be, yer gonna hafta double up a few times (i.e. get lucky)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2005, 11:07 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: PS 45-player slumming- standard or lunacy?

[ QUOTE ]
i think you have just about 0 FE here, esp from the BB.
I probably fold and call a push from BB if you have a face cards, pair, or 2 cards above a 6 [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Really though, you are so outchipped by both of them i dont think blind stealing is gonna get you where you need to be, yer gonna hafta double up a few times (i.e. get lucky)

[/ QUOTE ]

now that i think of it, [blind stealing oppurtunity] in this spot was totally the wrong thinking to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:05 AM
jon462 jon462 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: PS 45-player slumming- standard or lunacy?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think you have just about 0 FE here, esp from the BB.
I probably fold and call a push from BB if you have a face cards, pair, or 2 cards above a 6 [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Really though, you are so outchipped by both of them i dont think blind stealing is gonna get you where you need to be, yer gonna hafta double up a few times (i.e. get lucky)

[/ QUOTE ]

now that i think of it, [blind stealing oppurtunity] in this spot was totally the wrong thinking to begin with.

[/ QUOTE ]

now that i look, at your original post again is ee the massive stack is in SB, and the BB only has about 3.2x your stack. That changes things slightly (he calls you win you two are even).. but not much. I think it is defensible but I still fold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.