Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2005, 08:11 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Who here would volunteer

to have one of their children disembowelled to save 6 people who need organ donations. Anyone who says they wouldn't, can you please stop applying math to situations involving human life.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2005, 09:23 AM
BZ_Zorro BZ_Zorro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: $100 NL
Posts: 612
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

Amen.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2005, 09:55 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

I don't get what you're saying

Is this a logical argument or a request?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:10 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

Both.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

[ QUOTE ]
Both.

Mack

[/ QUOTE ]

So your argument is:

Sometimes you are incapable of applying math/logic to a situation, therefore, you never should
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:58 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

[ QUOTE ]
So your argument is:

Sometimes you are incapable of applying math/logic to a situation, therefore, you never should

[/ QUOTE ]

No my arguement is:

To the people who's opinion matters it is impossible to put a value on a human life. So a life is worth an infinite amount, therefore 1 life is = to 6 lives, in a manner of speaking.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:00 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

So what does that say about US military doctors after world war 2 who gave pregnant women plutonium, just to see what would happen?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:00 AM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

Your argument does not prove that. If it did, you should be indifferent between your child dying six other people dying. All it proves is that our moral intuitions do not coincide with any rational basis. This is not a reason to repudiate any rational thought about morality.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:14 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

Hi Bobman

What cash value do you put on your remaining days, imagine no one you care about gets to keep the money if you die, how are you coming to the calculations. If I was going to die tommorrow, I would still refuse all the money in the world in order to keep that one day of life.

I still say math is an inappropriate way to decide who lives and dies. Lets say for example (purely for the sake of numbers), the AIDS epidemic will kill 2 billion people, but we can eradicate this possibility by slaughtering 1 billion people today, is this genocide justified by the net saving of 1 billion people?

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:15 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Who here would volunteer

[ QUOTE ]
So what does that say about US military doctors after world war 2 who gave pregnant women plutonium, just to see what would happen?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry I'm not quite sure what you are asking me or why, care to clarify?

Mack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.