Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:22 AM
TheSalche TheSalche is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 97
Default KQs in SB, early level limpfest

Was a raise here with KQs OOP good? Should I have flat called or raised more/less?
(20+2 Party)

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (8 handed) converter

UTG+1 (t530)
MP1 (t745)
MP2 (t1020)
CO (t400)
Button (t530)
Hero (t1105)
BB (t1805)
UTG (t1865)

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls t30, UTG+1 calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls t30, CO calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t100</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG calls t70, UTG+1 calls t70, MP2 folds, CO folds.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:25 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

Raising to t100 in a pot of t180 preflop is generally a bad idea.

Big underbet. KQs really isn't that strong here. I complete and see a flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:26 AM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 234
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

I would limp.

If you are gonna raise, you have to raise to at least 130.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:27 AM
psyduck psyduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 235
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

complete.

when you raise to T100, I can see that you're bringing your ring game mentality into SNGs. by all means, raise KQs in the SB in a low-limit ring game, but KQ (suited or unsuited) isn't a raising hand this early in an SNG
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:31 AM
TheSalche TheSalche is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 97
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

okay, so lets say i do limp ... what if the board comes King or Queen xx unbroken, do i bet out 1/2 - 2/3 of the pot and be ready to fold to a lot of resistance?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:32 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

[ QUOTE ]
okay, so lets say i do limp ... what if the board comes King or Queen xx unbroken, do i bet out 1/2 - 2/3 of the pot and be ready to fold to a lot of resistance?

[/ QUOTE ]
No, you check. You fold to a bunch of resistance, but to a single bet, normally you call/raise, planning to make a move on the turn or to get to showdown.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:41 AM
SNOWBALL138 SNOWBALL138 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 518
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

Being in the SB here, its very difficult to play this postflop. I doubt that anyone is folding for an extra t70 here. You are building a pot here with a weak hand, and you are first to act postflop.

If you are going to raise here, you should raise to at least 180.


Limping here is fine though. I think its a nice, default move.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2005, 03:52 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw.
A raise of 2 1/3 bb IS wrong though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2005, 05:03 AM
Pete H Pete H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 105
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw.
A raise of 2 1/3 bb IS wrong though.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think raising is much more dangerous.

Let's say you make a proper raise (200+) and there's one caller.

Pot (~600)
Flop: K/Qxx (rainbow, no hearts)

You are first to act and you have 800-900 chips.

Options are:

Push
Bet 400 and call a push
Bet 400 and fold to a push (doesn't make any sense)
Check/fold (doesn't make any sense to raise preflop if you hit your pair and fold)
Check/push (or call if pushed), this would be my approach 'cos this gains some chips if the opponent is behind and if I raise preflop and flop K/Q I'm going to lose all my chips if I'm behind

I really hate to be in situations where I don't have enough chips to get information whether I'm behind or not.

Complete you must
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2005, 08:43 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is nonsense.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.