#1
|
|||
|
|||
KQs in SB, early level limpfest
Was a raise here with KQs OOP good? Should I have flat called or raised more/less?
(20+2 Party) Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (8 handed) converter UTG+1 (t530) MP1 (t745) MP2 (t1020) CO (t400) Button (t530) Hero (t1105) BB (t1805) UTG (t1865) Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG calls t30, UTG+1 calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls t30, CO calls t30, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t100</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG calls t70, UTG+1 calls t70, MP2 folds, CO folds. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
Raising to t100 in a pot of t180 preflop is generally a bad idea.
Big underbet. KQs really isn't that strong here. I complete and see a flop. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
I would limp.
If you are gonna raise, you have to raise to at least 130. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
complete.
when you raise to T100, I can see that you're bringing your ring game mentality into SNGs. by all means, raise KQs in the SB in a low-limit ring game, but KQ (suited or unsuited) isn't a raising hand this early in an SNG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
okay, so lets say i do limp ... what if the board comes King or Queen xx unbroken, do i bet out 1/2 - 2/3 of the pot and be ready to fold to a lot of resistance?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
[ QUOTE ]
okay, so lets say i do limp ... what if the board comes King or Queen xx unbroken, do i bet out 1/2 - 2/3 of the pot and be ready to fold to a lot of resistance? [/ QUOTE ] No, you check. You fold to a bunch of resistance, but to a single bet, normally you call/raise, planning to make a move on the turn or to get to showdown. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
Being in the SB here, its very difficult to play this postflop. I doubt that anyone is folding for an extra t70 here. You are building a pot here with a weak hand, and you are first to act postflop.
If you are going to raise here, you should raise to at least 180. Limping here is fine though. I think its a nice, default move. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw.
A raise of 2 1/3 bb IS wrong though. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
[ QUOTE ]
I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw. A raise of 2 1/3 bb IS wrong though. [/ QUOTE ] I think raising is much more dangerous. Let's say you make a proper raise (200+) and there's one caller. Pot (~600) Flop: K/Qxx (rainbow, no hearts) You are first to act and you have 800-900 chips. Options are: Push Bet 400 and call a push Bet 400 and fold to a push (doesn't make any sense) Check/fold (doesn't make any sense to raise preflop if you hit your pair and fold) Check/push (or call if pushed), this would be my approach 'cos this gains some chips if the opponent is behind and if I raise preflop and flop K/Q I'm going to lose all my chips if I'm behind I really hate to be in situations where I don't have enough chips to get information whether I'm behind or not. Complete you must |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQs in SB, early level limpfest
[ QUOTE ]
I agree that limping is the standard play here. But I don't think a standard raise (3-5 bb plus extra because of the limpers) is wrong either. Actually I think limping could bring danger if a K or Q hits and someone else hits a strong draw. [/ QUOTE ] This is nonsense. |
|
|