#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ownage of a minraise bluff
I seem to only post hands where i misread min-raises, so here's one where i'm right...
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (Villian)/ (6 max, 6 handed) converter Hero ($100.50) CO ($125.46) Button ($116.40) SB ($178.42) BB (Villian)/ ($91) UTG ($146.35) Preflop: Hero is MP with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.50. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, BB :#A500AF(Villian)/ calls $3. Flop: ($8.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Villian checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $6</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Villian raises to $12</font>, Hero calls $6. Turn: ($32.50) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Villian bets $30</font>, Hero calls $30. River: ($92.50) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Villian all-in for 45, Hero calls $45. converter got messed up, but villian had A5. woooo ya... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
perfectly played
EDIT: uh, based on your read. i'm not advocating calling down with one pair every time there's four to a straight on the board [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
I think the turn might be a good time to put him all in, he doesn't have much money left and I would want to put it in before an A, K, Q scares his TT away or loses you the pot.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
[ QUOTE ]
I think the turn might be a good time to put him all in, he doesn't have much money left and I would want to put it in before an A, K, Q scares his TT away or loses you the pot. [/ QUOTE ] the problem with putting him in on the turn is that if he has basically a pure bluff, then he'll fold. by calling i allow him to make the final desperation bluff. your point is valid though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
Are you sure you had him on a pure bluff (actually it was a semi-bluff, he had outs, river is pure bluff, though) before you saw his hand at showdown?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
You'll probably be up against a lower overpair or TPTK more than you will be against a pure bluff. Plus many opponents will realize that if you called that bet on the turn you won't be folding for a lower percent of the pot.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
[ QUOTE ]
You'll probably be up against a lower overpair or TPTK more than you will be against a pure bluff. Plus many opponents will realize that if you called that bet on the turn you won't be folding for a lower percent of the pot. [/ QUOTE ] i agree and had similar thoughts. however, what does putting him in on the turn accomplish other than potentially causing him to fold his TPTK and pure bluff? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ownage of a minraise bluff
I think most of the time I see this line villain has a set.
The Doc |
|
|