Non-American Winner

joecash · #1 07-19-2005, 12:00 AM

Is this a bad thing for poker? Its not the big story it has been the last 2 years with moneymaker and fossilman. An unknown from a foreign country. What do people think?

Nottom · #2 07-19-2005, 03:58 AM

I think its better for poker overall than another random American.

flo · #3 07-19-2005, 05:43 AM

Moneymaker was unknown, too, and Raymer wasn't considered a pro player. Why should it be bad if a non-american player wins?

curtains · #4 07-19-2005, 06:18 AM

I don't mean to be a downer, but people seem to spend a lot too much time on this forum thinking about whether this or that is "good" for poker.

TStoneMBD · #5 07-19-2005, 07:20 AM

i think the question is more about being inquistive then posters actually trying to apply the results. for that reason alone its a good question.

MrTrik · #6 07-19-2005, 09:42 AM

I don't know where I stand on this or a more pressing matter ... what would be better for poker? 1) I go take a nasty dump -or- 2) Make some breakfast and then go have my intestinal event?

spydog · #7 07-19-2005, 09:48 AM

Not sure about the American/non-American thing, but I think the fact that 73o won a guy $7.5 million is certainly going to have a positive effect for TAGs.

Uppercut · #8 07-19-2005, 10:44 AM

In fact, I believe that Hachem is only the 2nd winner in 36 years not to be an American (Carlos Mortensen in 2001 was the first).

PS Scotty Nyguen is an American citizen.

jakethebake · #9 07-19-2005, 10:56 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I don't mean to be a downer, but people seem to spend a lot too much time on this forum thinking about whether this or that is "good" for poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Leave them alone. I find these posts hilarious.

TylerD · #10 07-19-2005, 11:03 AM

Noel Furlong, 1999 ME winner is Irish.