#1
|
|||
|
|||
Troops to the Philippines
I had previously thought that those running foreign policy for the Bush administration had some of the great minds of the 1940s. Now I see they have adopted the thinking of the 1890s as well.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
A salutation-speech from the Nineteenth Century to the Twentieth, Taken Down in Short-Hand by Mark Twain
" I bring your the stately named Christendom, returning bedraggled, besmirched and dishonored from pirate-raids in Kiao-Chow, Manchuria, South Africa and the Philippines, with her soul full of meanness, her pocket full of boddle, and her mouth full of pious hypocrisies. Give her soap and a towel, but hide the looking-glass." Mark Twain, New York, Dec. 31, 1900 Good ol' Mark did a bit of ranting against what he considered America's (and other countries) excessive "imperialism" or as he puts it, "The Blessings of Civilzation" during the late 1800's and early 1900's. Twain's essay, " To The Person Sitting in Darkness" is a prime example and very interesting to read. -Zeno |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
"Shall we go on conferring our Civilization upon the peoples that sit in darkness, or shall we give those poor things a rest? Shall we bang right ahead in our old-time, loud, pious way, and commit the new century to the game; or shall we sober up and sit down and think it over first?"
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
andyfox, what are you talking about?
The US troops are there to help the Philippine military hunt down the notorious, kidnapping, murderous, terrorist group call Abu Sayyaf on the island of Jolo. Abu Sayyaf kidnaps people on the high seas for ransom, commits murder and other terrorist acts--and may have ties to Jemaah Islamiyah and al Qaeda. They're as much a group of kidnappers/thugs as they are terrorists. I say wipe the creeps out--and if the Philippine government wants our help, great! The sooner Abu Sayyaf is dealt with, the better for everyone. What's your concern here, anyway? Less than 2,000 US troops will be involved. I'm afraid I don't understand your objections. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
Agree with you, M. If we're going to declare war on terrorism, we have to go after Abu Sayyaf. Any other course of action would be illogical.
The only concern I have is what our role BECOMES once we've set up shop for a year or two. These missions tend to change directions over time; what started out as a manhunt of some criminals could, over time, turn into another case of big brother America "supervising" a smaller country. I don't think that is going to happen in this case, but I'm sure that's the concern of the liberal argument. And given history, I'd consider it a legitimate one. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
Condidering that Subic base was closed in 1992 and our massive military presence withdrawn from the Phillipines, I fail to see how less than 2,000 troops sent to an archiplelago island called Jolo for the specific purpose of helping the Filipinos deal with Abu Sayyaf even remotely portends anything on a much larger scale.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
"I fail to see how less than 2,000 troops sent to an archiplelago island called Jolo for the specific purpose of helping the Filipinos deal with Abu Sayyaf even remotely portends anything on a much larger scale."
--I agree. As of today, it looks like nothing more than us hunting down some criminals. As such, it's an action consistent with our war on terror, and I agree with it. Our intentions and actions to his point look fine to me. I'm just saying that it's not guaranteed to remain that in the long-run. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
Somehow my previous post got lost.
Bush is rewarding his pal Arroyo for her support in the war on terror. That's what friends do I guess. It's not as if the Abu Sayyaf aren't worth hunting down like rabid dogs. But Gloria faces a small problem. It is against the constitution of the Philippines for foreign troops to fight on that country's soil. Advisors and trainers are okay, warriors are not. So far Ms Arroyo has not come out and said "They are only here to train our troops again." Interesting. Even more interesting is that Dubya may be looking for a new place to relocate those U.S. military personel now serving in South Korea. Seeing how badly he has screwed up with the NorKors. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
"These missions tend to change directions over time; what started out as a manhunt of some criminals could, over time, turn into another case of big brother America "supervising" a smaller country."
That is what I''m talking about. The history of the United States going into other countriews to wipe out the local "bandits" is a sorry one. We did the same thing in the Philippines in the "Spanish-American" War. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Troops to the Philippines
Given that American policy is to establish presences in areas of stategic interest, mainly the Middle East and South-East Asia, I doubt those troops will be leaving soon.
|
|
|