Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2005, 12:44 PM
yoolykeme yoolykeme is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
Default Would the Martingale work in this situation?

Hi, I was at the casino last night, and noticed something. They have a Baccarat game with a $10 min/$50,000max. Is this spread large enough to justify the "unlimited bankroll/no max bet" theory that says that Martingale would work if there were no table limits and you had an unlimited bankroll?

My initial read says that if you lose 10 in a row, youre toast. And this is assuming you always play the 'player,' where no commission is taken out.

Anyway, I know that this is silly, please someone just tell me why. Thanks [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2005, 12:57 PM
LetYouDown LetYouDown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sharing a smoke w/negativity
Posts: 524
Default Re: Would the Martingale work in this situation?

Martingale doesn't work...period. Like you said, unlimited bankroll, and no table limit are the only ways to guarantee it will work.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2005, 02:16 PM
SheetWise SheetWise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 841
Default Re: Would the Martingale work in this situation?

I just ran a simulation of 1MM hands, using $1 and $50,000 as limits -

Longest run for the Bank, 19 hands.
Longest run for the player, 18 hands.
Player 44.7, Bank 45.8, Tie 9.5
Handle 18,806,750
Biggest Win 201,916
Biggest Loss 605,550
Result after 1MM, -392,101
There were at least 13 unrecoverable progressions.

Conclusion - If you are willing to play this strategy at least 8 hours a day, I can get you free rooms and a plane ticket.

SheetWise
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:00 PM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Would the Martingale work in this situation?

[ QUOTE ]
Is this spread large enough to justify the "unlimited bankroll/no max bet" theory that says that Martingale would work if there were no table limits and you had an unlimited bankroll?

[/ QUOTE ]
If you are allowed to use really large negative numbers, can you choose negative numbers that add up to a positive number? No. This is -EV.

The people who say that a martingale would work with an unlimited bankroll are misleading you. First, this doesn't correctly model any real situation, unlike good mathematical models. Second, if you have an infinite amount of money, you can say that you make money by giving money away, too, since infinity-1 = infinity+1. Again, that doesn't apply to any real situation.

The probability you double your money before going bankrupt is always less than 1/2.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2005, 07:22 AM
randomstumbl randomstumbl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 313
Default Re: Would the Martingale work in this situation?

When people say you need an infinite bankroll, they mean infinite. If the spread was $1 to $1,000,000,000,000,000,000 it wouldn't matter. You'd still have the exact same odds for winning or losing. All the Martingale does is change the frequency of wins and losses by changing their magnitude.

The reason it works with an infinite bankroll is that you never quit until you're ahead. You'll eventually lose everything if there's some number of losses that you would have to quit after (such as exhausting the world's supply of money).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.