Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2003, 03:52 AM
jen jen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 364
Default NL vs limit starting hands

I'm thinking of trying my first NL hold'em game. I'm pretty comfortable with mid-limit (20-40ish) games.

Are there any general principles about what good starting hands are in NL vs limit games (especially for a beginner)? Or am I going to have to pay for my education...

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2003, 09:53 AM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

In very simplistic terms, one of the main ways you make money in a limit game is by starting with better cards than your opponents. In NL/PL, the main way is by fooling your opponents into making incorrect folds or big calls.

Implied odds typically rule in a big bet game. When the money is really deep, I will raise preflop with hands like 53s, simply because an opponent with QQ or the like might pay me off their entire stack when the board on the end reads QJ642. If I don't have to put in too much money before I make my hand, and can get paid off big once I do make it, it really isn't so important how weak it was preflop.

This doesn't mean you should fold everytime you face a huge river bet and don't have the absolute nuts. It does mean you shouldn't think something like there's no way he could have 53 (the only hand that beats you) because he raised preflop. Even from a great player, sometimes anything is possible. In fact, it is really only the weak-tight players who will never show up with a hand like 53 in a raised pot.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2003, 11:22 AM
RollaJ RollaJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,695
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

While I agree fully with playing hands you would never think of playing in a limit game, you should not play thim for too big a raise (lets say over 3 times the BB) as if you dont hit 2 pair on the flop you are usually going to be bet out of the hand, as people will put a lot of money behind top pair if they hit it on the flop as well as over pairs in the pocket, so you basically have [img]/forums/images/icons/grin.gif[/img] to get in cheap, and if you hit, the sky is the limit
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2003, 11:30 AM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

Yes, you must get in cheap. But to me cheap doesn't mean some multiple of the blinds. Cheap means some percentage of how much you will likely win after you hit your hand.

If the blinds are 5,10, and it costs me $100 to see the flop with a marginal hand, that's perfectly accpetable if I will lose only $100 when I miss, but I know the guy will pay me off an average of $5000 when I hit.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2003, 07:38 PM
jen jen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 364
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

Hmmm. Seems kind of tricky to pick the right spots.

I'll give it a try and see how it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2003, 12:07 PM
RollaJ RollaJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,695
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

I think in a perfect world where I have unlimited money that may be the correct way to play it, but as opposed to just worrying about how much I may win I must also protect my stack and hope to get my money in when I have the best of it. Also there is no way to know that the other guy will pay you off when you hit your 5-3 and make 2 pair a set or a straight. If he was betting A-K or A-Q he very may well fold to a bet or raise. I stand by my belief that you should have to get in very cheap, and I personally focus more on blind ratio as this very often (usually) indicates the strength of the opponents hand, as well as the size of my stack....I want to make sure I still have money left when I get a premium hand
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2003, 12:20 PM
thebroker thebroker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 221
Default Greg is dead on as always...............

..........calling up to ten percent of your stack with a pocket pair or suited connector is fine. If you can win at least 15 or 20 times the preflop amount when you hit. Your not really looking for strong starting hands in pot-limit or no-limit, you're looking for strong situations. You find a guy who will commit his whole stack AFTER the flop with AA or KK and make a ton of cash.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2003, 12:39 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

Of course you can never KNOW whether or not they will pay you off. But you can make educated guesses that have some reasonable accuracy. You can be aware of the player's history, and whether or not he's prone to paying off. If I know nothing about the person, I will be quite a bit less inclined to make plays that depend upon his future actions in the hand, either letting himself get stuck, OR his ability to make a reasonably big laydown.

Some of the biggest pots I've ever won in a PLH game were with relatively lousy starting cards. And sometimes I called raises preflop and/or pot-sized bets on the flop. When you raise to $15 preflop, call a reraise to $45, and then call the $100 bet on the flop, it's tough for an opponent to laydown top set to your gutshot straight catch on the turn that requires you to have started the whole hand with 53. Often they will bet $200-300 at you on the turn, and when you raise to $1000 they will at least call and sometimes reraise big. They figure you have an underset or overpair to their TT on the T26-4 board. More than once I've put in that $150 or so preflop and on the flop, and then won $3-5000 on the turn and river.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2003, 03:00 PM
Phat Mack Phat Mack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: People\'s Republic of Texas
Posts: 791
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

I can't dispute anything Greg says, especially as it pertains to pot limit. In no limit, as a beginner, I think you should be playing big cards: high pairs and AK etc. Try to flop a made hand (a set or top pair, top kicker) and get your stack in the middle. Don't let your opponents see cheap flops; don't let them see fourth street at all. Buy in cheap and buy in often. Save the tricky stuff for when you have more experience. JMO, Mack
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-15-2003, 08:10 AM
jen jen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 364
Default Re: NL vs limit starting hands

> get your stack in the middle

What does that mean?

Also, I heard somewhere that if I want to bet pre-flop, I should always raise the same amount -- something like 3x the BB. And then on later streets, if I want to bet, just bet the pot. Is that right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.