Less suckouts at 2/4 SH?

kapw7 · #1 07-07-2005, 04:09 PM

PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed) converter

MP is decent, UTG is an idiot LAGbut not exactly a maniac

Preflop: Hero is CO with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
UTG calls, MP raises, Hero 3-bets, 2 folds, BB calls, UTG calls, MP calls.

Flop: (12.50 SB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (4 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, Hero bets, BB calls, UTG calls, MP calls.

Turn: (8.25 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (4 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, Hero bets, BB folds, UTG calls, MP calls.

River: (11.25 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 players)
UTG checks, MP bets, Hero folds

TomBrooks · #2 07-07-2005, 04:39 PM

What Suckout? MP might have had A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] KQJT9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or some other high clubs and would have been correct to call down.

RIVER: I don't like the fold. MP looks to have made a flush, but I would call to be sure. Maybe he is taking a shot to steal the pot on the chance you've been firing with just overcards or you are capable of laying down a weak made hand to a straight scare card. He could have been playing A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K-J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] etc. and had nothing.

Edited: Fixed River comment as Hero is last to act.

kapw7 · #3 07-07-2005, 04:46 PM

[ QUOTE ]

RIVER: Check looks good, but I would have called MP's River bet, especially since you might have induced a bluff with the check. He could have been playing A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K-J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] etc. and had nothing.

[/ QUOTE ]

But: Hero is CO. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

handsome · #4 07-07-2005, 05:08 PM

re: the title why would you there are less suckouts short-handed? But anyway, damn, sucks that you don't close the action on the river.

Dead · #5 07-07-2005, 05:10 PM

bad beat posts are lame Kapo.

deception5 · #6 07-07-2005, 05:16 PM

Tough laydown, but looks good.

kapw7 · #7 07-07-2005, 05:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
bad beat posts are lame Kapo.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Not necessarilly a bad beat post. I hate bad beat posts. (And bad beats). Let me explain:

The title has a question mark. Was it a suckout? Just wanted to see what people would advise for the river and whether the title would affect objectivity.

deception5 · #8 07-07-2005, 05:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The title has a question mark. Was it a suckout? Just wanted to see what people would advise for the river and whether the title would affect objectivity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only hands I can think of that you beat are KQ bluffing the river, 99 playing wa/wb or splitting with JJ.

You are behind AA/KK/QQ/TT/AK/AQ/AJ/AT.

If it were heads up I think you'd pick off a bluff here often enough, but with 3 players at the river I think this is too often an ace that doesn't want to get checked through.

pryor15 · #9 07-07-2005, 05:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]
He could have been playing A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K-J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] etc. and had nothing.

[/ QUOTE ]

uh, that would give him the wheel.

Rev. Good Will · #10 07-07-2005, 06:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]
bad beat posts are lame Kapo.

[/ QUOTE ]

we rarely hear from you, and your only contributions to the microlimit forums is to ridicule somebody, especially for bad beat posts. what a hypocrite

I should've done this a long time ago... [ QUOTE ]
You are now ignoring this user. You will no longer see the body of any of their posts.

[/ QUOTE ]