Playing weird hole cards

[Gene2x]

As an experiment, at a $2-$4 and then a $3-$6 table, I started playing low one and two gap suited or unsuited hands like 47, 53, etc. I would call two bets cold with them, even out of position. What characterized the tables was that I could count on at least 4 or 5 players seeing the flop. I would look for straight draws, two pair, even one pair with no high cards on the board, runner-runner, etc- basically your nightmare low-limit player if you're trying to play by the book. I made $500 in 4 hours.

After cashing out, I tried the experiment again with $50. I built it up to $160 but then lost it all as I didn't adjust to the table changing to tight/aggressive with only 2 to 3 players seeing the flop.

I guess my point is that any two cards really can win, but you have to be able to change gears depending on the nature of the table.

[Webster]

you are kidding right?

[halis123456789]

Hey man, good job. If you really win playing like that $500 in 4 hours = $125/hour..NICE!!! Keep up the good work! In fact come play at the $2/$4 on UltimateBet. I've met all your brothers and sisters and they play just like you!

[Nick C]

I'll respond just in case you're serious.

The strategy you're describing is really bad.

It can, however, win in the short-term.

[Gene2x]

Yeah. I was serious. I was pretty stunned but happy to have the money. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I felt this couldn't last, that's why I cashed out right away. I also noticed that other players where playing the same way and winning.

Some of the bigger pots I lost were to other players who would play a hand like 47 when I had 53 and the board would come 5Q369. Players would play and push AA, KK, AK, AQ, KQ, QJ, QT, A5, A3, A2, etc. really hard pre-flop and post-flop making for nice pots.

Like I said, the tables where this worked was were many players made and called raises pre and post-flop (loose aggressive). This strategy went nowhere in a tight-aggressive setting.

[QTip]

[ QUOTE ]
Like I said, the tables where this worked was were many players made and called raises pre and post-flop (loose aggressive). This strategy went nowhere in a tight-aggressive setting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You got lucky is all. It has nothing to do with tables settings.

[krimson]

Your right, any two will do. (implied odds!)

[thejameser]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Like I said, the tables where this worked was were many players made and called raises pre and post-flop (loose aggressive). This strategy went nowhere in a tight-aggressive setting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You got lucky is all. It has nothing to do with tables settings.

[/ QUOTE ]