Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:51 AM
spentrent spentrent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 766
Default $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) converter

UTG+1 (t800)
UTG+2 (t770)
MP1 (t770)
Hero (t800)
MP3 (t995)
CO (t770)
Button (t745)
SB (t1340)
BB (t755)
UTG (t255)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls t15, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls t15, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls t15, Button calls t15, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: (t87.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
SB checks, BB bets 75, UTG calls 75, Hero ???


BB's bet + UTG's call + 3 left to act causes Hero to autofold his overpair here. Solid poker or leaky poker?

In a cash game I'll raise here more often than not to try to isolate one of the villains in front, but in a Party-style tournament I don't want to spew chips this early.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:56 AM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

I like the fold. If you have the best hand, with two active players and 3 left to act, you're hand is vulnerable. Plus it's an unraised pot.

Fold, maintain your stack, outplay the donkeys later. NH.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:58 AM
OrcaDK OrcaDK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 42
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

[ QUOTE ]
I like the fold. If you have the best hand, with two active players and 3 left to act, you're hand is vulnerable. Plus it's an unraised pot.

Fold, maintain your stack, outplay the donkeys later. NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

What he said.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:01 PM
spentrent spentrent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 766
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

[ QUOTE ]
I like the fold. If you have the best hand, with two active players and 3 left to act, you're hand is vulnerable. Plus it's an unraised pot.

Fold, maintain your stack, outplay the donkeys later. NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you like this line a cash game as well? Your statement about an unraised pot reminds me of Doyle's maxim from Super System.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:07 PM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

[ QUOTE ]
Do you like this line a cash game as well? Your statement about an unraised pot reminds me of Doyle's maxim from Super System.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, yes. I'd be more likely to continue with the hand in a cash game, but I'd probably still fold because of the factors that I gave earlier.

I sometimes play 25NL and, man, you can really make some money by nut peddling... This is one of those "vulnerable, weak made hands" spots against multiple opponents that I really don't like to get too involved with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2005, 04:41 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?


I agree with this fold as well. This is almost automatic for me in this type of situation in a multiway field.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2005, 04:57 PM
JeanieJ JeanieJ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

The board is far too scarey to continue here. You've got the straight draw, the flush draw not to mention any two pair (which could be out there at these limits).

Folding is the only move here in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-28-2005, 11:17 AM
AA suited AA suited is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

[ QUOTE ]
I like the fold. If you have the best hand, with two active players and 3 left to act, you're hand is vulnerable. Plus it's an unraised pot.

Fold, maintain your stack, outplay the donkeys later. NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting..

Since this is a 10+1, I would have put them on a straight/flush draw and raised to 200 to make it expensive.

Then go all-in on turn if no draw card.

But you're saying why risk it so early in the tourny when you only invested 15 chips?

But the pot is ~200... 25% added to your stack is not worth the risk in this situation???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-28-2005, 11:49 AM
45suited 45suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: up to the 22s and 33s!
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: $11: Level 1 weak-tightness -- is this a leak or a solid fold?

[ QUOTE ]
Since this is a 10+1, I would have put them on a straight/flush draw and raised to 200 to make it expensive.

[/ QUOTE ]

But there are two active players with 3 yet to act. One of them made an almost pot sized bet and the other one called it. BB could literally have anything: two pair, OESD, flush draw. UTG might just have two overs, but that adds to the list of cards that can beat you on the turn or river. Now you add in the possibility that one of the other 3 yet to act has a piece of this board or a draw... the list of turn and river cards that can beat you is huge. And there are exactly two cards that can improve YOUR hand.

[ QUOTE ]
Then go all-in on turn if no draw card.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again, you might not even be ahead here... There is a draw heavy flop, in a six way, unraised pot.

[ QUOTE ]
But you're saying why risk it so early in the tourny when you only invested 15 chips?

[/ QUOTE ]

How much I've invested in the pot is not relevant to my decision. I'm just basing the decision on the factors listed above.

[ QUOTE ]
But the pot is ~200... 25% added to your stack is not worth the risk in this situation???

[/ QUOTE ]

No, and I don't think it's even close, especially at an 11, why get involved here in the face of all the negative factors when it is so easy to outplay these guys later? If you're behind here, you have two cards that can improve your hand. If you're ahead, half the deck could easily beat you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.