|
|
#1
06-25-2005, 04:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
Still new to SNG'S and learning alot from this forum. Call the all-in on the river?
***** Hand History for Game 2261770868 ***** NL Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:13398934 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Saturday, June 25, 16:03:53 EDT 2005 Table Table 11207 (Real Money) Seat 6 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 7: LaKingZulu ( $800 ) Seat 9: efxaristo ( $800 ) Seat 1: FLASH_GUY ( $800 ) Seat 4: KJFjr ( $800 ) Seat 6: bouster ( $800 ) Seat 2: hard8er ( $800 ) Seat 5: JohnnyTHAman ( $800 ) Seat 10: Hookem25 ( $800 ) Seat 8: TruAZN8888 ( $800 ) Seat 3: crewboss1 ( $800 ) Trny:13398934 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to LaKingZulu [ 4c Jd ] efxaristo folds. Hookem25 calls [15]. FLASH_GUY folds. hard8er folds. crewboss1 folds. KJFjr calls [15]. JohnnyTHAman folds. bouster folds. LaKingZulu calls [5]. TruAZN8888 checks. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 3d, Jh, 8d ] LaKingZulu bets [30]. TruAZN8888 calls [30]. Hookem25 folds. KJFjr calls [30]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 7c ] LaKingZulu bets [50]. TruAZN8888 calls [50]. KJFjr calls [50]. ** Dealing River ** [ 4h ] LaKingZulu bets [100]. TruAZN8888 folds. KJFjr is all-In [705] LaKingZulu....? 
|
|
#2
06-25-2005, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
Well, to answer your question first, yes, I'd pay off the all in with the two pairs. It's possible he has trips, but at this level of table ($11), anything happens, and it is more likely he has top pair with higher kicker or an overpair.
However, there is the issue of how you reached the river in the first place. Frankly, I'd have folded as of the first bet. Your kicker is garbage, so any Jack with a card higher than a 4 has you beat. Every call you made until the river is a blunder to my eyes. Don't take this the wrong way, but I would strongly advise you to read a book or two, or you will find your stay at the tables to be an expensive one. Albert
|
|
#3
06-25-2005, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
However, there is the issue of how you reached the river in the first place. Frankly, I'd have folded as of the first bet. Your kicker is garbage, so any Jack with a card higher than a 4 has you beat. Every call you made until the river is a blunder to my eyes. Albert [/ QUOTE ] He didn't call either flop or turn [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#4
06-25-2005, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
he have 56?
|
|
#5
06-25-2005, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
Firstoff, I wouldn't bet the flop. if it did, I would bet more, and if I did bet what you did and got two callers, I wouldn't bet the turn and would enter check/fold mode.
You are showing some weakness IMO w those small bets, including the river one (1/3rd the pot). I would call, thinking that he was tryin to bluff me or, more likely, had AJ or KJ - though a set is certainly possible.
|
|
#6
06-25-2005, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
Yeah. Definitely. And your small bets on the flop and turn suck. I'd check/fold here with a mediocre hand and 4 players in the pot, maybe call small bets for EV.
|
|
#7
06-25-2005, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah. Definitely. And your small bets on the flop and turn suck. I'd check/fold here with a mediocre hand and 4 players in the pot, maybe call small bets for EV. [/ QUOTE ] ^^^^^^agreed^^^^^^ I was about to type out a post saying the same thing :-P.
|
|
#8
06-25-2005, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very first hand of a 10+1, call the all-in on the river?
Cool, thanks for the advice. Like I said, new to SNG'S and trying to get out of the limit mindset. I called and the vllian had 66? wtf?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
