|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Guage vs. Stacey Valentine | |||
| Guage |
   
|
28 | 52.83% |
| Stacey Valentine |
  
|
25 | 47.17% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
06-24-2005, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Best Sitcom -- Seeding
To weed it down to 16:
|
|
#2
06-24-2005, 10:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
I am 19, sorry if my lack of historical perspective ruins the poll.
|
|
#3
06-24-2005, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
It is a given that the results will reflect the age of the voters.
|
|
#4
06-24-2005, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
[ QUOTE ]
It is a given that the results will reflect the age of the voters. [/ QUOTE ] That really sucks because "Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman" is way better than "Seinfeld" but age is going to ruin it's chances.
|
|
#5
06-24-2005, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
True, but I did pick dinasours. I really hope that makes it to the next round.
I'm the baby!
|
|
#6
06-24-2005, 10:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
I am going to be out of town most of the weekend. So someone please make sure this thread stays on the first page to make sure it gets votes. I know that showing results would start more discussion, but hiding the results keeps people from saying, "Well, since Seinfeld is already in, I might as well save that vote to get my #11 choice in that may be on the bubble."
|
|
#9
06-24-2005, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best Sitcom -- Seeding
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] True, but I did pick dinasours. I really hope that makes it to the next round. I'm the baby! [/ QUOTE ] Wow, that show sucked ass. [/ QUOTE ] Most of it sucked ass, but "not the momma" *hits dad with frying pan* ruled. On another note, Growing Pains was left out...why?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
