Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2003, 07:08 PM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Are extremists on an issue a required component?

The arguments for and against RMGP, on RGP, had me thinking about a topic that I've thought about (in different arenas) before
(NOTE for the uninitiated- the RGP discussed centers around starting a moderated Rec.Gambling.Poker newsgroup).

The topic? Doesn't any good debate REQUIRE crazy extremists, on both sides, in order to more fully expose the issues and develop their solutions?

Or, put another way, no matter how crazy, uncivil, obnoxious, erratic some fringes of any debate are..... would the discussion not be as well defined WITHOUT them? No matter HOW much you'd like to throttle them (or how much they DESERVE to be throttled)?

I've been meaning to put together an essay on this, and hopefully when I have more time, I will (and can add it to this thread) in order to explain my thoughts in detail... but I thought the timing was more important than the final product....

Fire away!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2003, 07:28 PM
IrishHand IrishHand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 888
Default Re: Are extremists on an issue a required component?

I think the reason you generally have extremists in every issue is that they're the ones who feel strongly enough about a matter that they invest the time and energy to research their side to the highest level. Most people in or near the middle don't care enough to waste time and energy on the issue.

Of course, this phenomena is also a desired by-product of an open, democratic society, as you alluded to.

Irish
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-21-2003, 01:42 PM
marbles marbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
Posts: 568
Default Re: Are extremists on an issue a required component?

Extremists can be good, but I don't think the extremism itself is as important as total information. Extremists tend to know a lot about arguing their extreme position, largely because they have had to defend it from so many angles over time.

So, as it turns out, you get two extremists defending their views and offering up all sorts of different defenses of their positions. If the reader in the middle has the patience and wisdom to sift through all of the garbage, he can pull some nice value out of the discussion.

The thing is, you don't have to have a controversial topic to get this kind of passion out of a discussion... IIRC, my "best fruit" post got a flurry of hits a few months back. What can I say... People care very deeply about their choices in fruit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2003, 02:05 PM
whiskeytown whiskeytown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 700
Default Re: Are extremists on an issue a required component?

extremism, yes...

character assassination...bald face lies...unnecessary..

RB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.