What to do with keeping track of new ROI numbers with the blind change

[Bigwig]

Just make a note as to when it happened, to calculate the difference?

I'm more upset about having to keep track of something new more than anything else.

[pineapple888]

What possible significance could it have to record the difference? It's not like you can go back to the old system.

Anyway, you'd need about a billion trials to be confident that the change in blind structure caused any difference in your results.

[Bigwig]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, you'd need about a billion trials to be confident that the change in blind structure caused any difference in your results.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know. But it will have a change. It should certainly increase my ROI. You're right about the sample size, though. I'll never know what % it actually increased. All I know is that my hourly rate will certainly be hurt without a 1.67% increase in ROI. Hope the blind level accomplishes that. But I doubt it.

[Jason Strasser]

donk donk donk

[Myst]

Stop focusing on the numbers and instead just plug as many Sngs as you can possibly can. As long as you are playing your best, thats all that really matters in the end anyway.

[Bigwig]

[ QUOTE ]
donk donk donk

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF?

[Bigwig]

[ QUOTE ]
Stop focusing on the numbers and instead just plug as many Sngs as you can possibly can. As long as you are playing your best, thats all that really matters in the end anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, one of the most accurate and objective measures of good play is ROI.

Anyway, I'm not 'caught up in numbers.' Posting a question about if I should keep track of a new set of data due to the blind change is a far cry from such a thing.

[Myst]

How can a 1-2 % difference in ROI be a measure of good play when all the RESULTS of this game we play are due to variance?

[freemoney]

you are really missing the big picture if you think this is important to track.

[microbet]

Maybe he has good vision and can see really big pictures and really tiny pictures.