Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2005, 03:16 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Speaking of blocks....

Ideal application of what Gigabet was talking about, or just common sense with the pot odds being offered? This was a 40+4 Half Million Qualifier on Party.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t100 (9 handed) converter

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

<font color="#C00000">SB (t388)</font>
<font color="#C00000">Hero (t1812)</font>
UTG (t1005)
UTG+1 (t1065)
MP1 (t905)
MP2 (t880)
MP3 (t1135)
CO (t550)
<font color="#C00000">Button (t260)</font>

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, Button calls [t260] , SB calls [t388] t50, Hero calls t288....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2005, 03:35 PM
Phill S Phill S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nr Manchester, England
Posts: 255
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

Standard play.

I dont get the blocks thing just yet, give me a few days and ill try and form something on it - or nick someone elses opinion - but i dont think this is what Giga meant.

Phill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:46 PM
Sabrazack Sabrazack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 312
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

I bet Giga is sitting home in his chair laughing at all of you trying to implement his "block theory" into your game.

(Hope this thing doesn't generate thousands of "Was this a good place for a Gigamove?" threads)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:55 PM
The Yugoslavian The Yugoslavian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 130
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

N/M

Standard...

Yugoslav
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:57 PM
Unarmed Unarmed is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

www.lego.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2005, 05:19 PM
Moonsugar Moonsugar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 170
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

That is: Gigamove(TM)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2005, 05:44 PM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

Yeah, standard... but I think giga's thinking goes deeper than this.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2005, 06:07 PM
the shadow the shadow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shadows abound all around
Posts: 150
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-13-2005, 12:16 AM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

I guess that the point I was trying to make here is, would this still be a standard call if I was sitting at t812 instead of t1812?

When the hand came up, I thought immediately of the other thread...I had the chip lead, but not a commanding one. In that sense, the t288 that I risk on this hand is pretty much worthless to me at that point; it doesn't gain me any extra folding equity or push me any closer to winning the SNG. But if my stack is smaller, or even average, then it's not worth it to call the extra t288 for me because I need to protect what chips I have, and K6o can't possibly be a favorite here, or even close enough to justify the 3:1 or so pot odds I'm being offered (vs. two opponents).

Forgive the noob questions...I am a relative noob when it comes to MTT/SNG play. This is just a call that I wouldn't have thought to make before reading Gigabet's post.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-13-2005, 01:03 AM
Matt R. Matt R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 351
Default Re: Speaking of blocks....

It's a standard call simply because you're getting 2.6:1 on your call and you're going to see all 5 cards, nothing more. I think if you had t812 you'd still have to make the call. Now, if you have t812 and 72o, I think you'd be correct to fold here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.