|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How many posts? | |||
| 0-99 |
   
|
19 | 95.00% |
| 100-199 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 200-299 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 300-399 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 400-499 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 500-599 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 600-699 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 700-799 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 800-899 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 900-999 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 1000+ |
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
06-12-2005, 02:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which loss is worse?
Lohan, Lohan, Lohan.
I guess I should give some reasoning. I thought that before, Lohan looked best because she had a curvier, fuller body, which I'm a big fan of, and I always thought that portman was just way too skinny. I think that now Lohan is hotter because they've got like the same body, except Lohan has hair. I think Lohan was the bigger loss because I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] her. 
|
|
#4
06-12-2005, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which loss is worse?
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know why Portman shaved her head? [/ QUOTE ] For her current movie.
|
|
#6
06-12-2005, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which loss is worse?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm going Portman, Portman, Lohan. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
