Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:22 PM
cfjr2 cfjr2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 99
Default thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (8 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, Hero calls.

Flop: (4.50 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (3.25 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, Hero calls.

River: (7.25 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 9.25 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:24 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

I would 3-bet the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:26 PM
cfjr2 cfjr2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 99
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

even tho villan may have TJ for nuts?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:28 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

He may, but he did raise UTG+1. Most players aren't raising that there. He's more likely to have KQ or AQ or something.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:30 PM
sungod sungod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 81
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

[ QUOTE ]
even tho villan may have TJ for nuts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Even though it's tempting at times, don't search too long for monsters under the bed. 3-bet that turn. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:39 PM
PuckNPoker PuckNPoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

or QQ, or 99...

Yes, absolutely. If you constantly fear the nuts you wont make money. Is TJs a likely raising hand UTG+1? Villian most likely has AQ hit his Q and raised you. You put your opponents on a range of hands and measure your hand to that range, yours is a very extremely favorable situation, bet bet bet bet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:47 PM
cfjr2 cfjr2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 99
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

monsters and rivers been coming out from under the bed all night - think maybe its time to roll it up for the night - down more BB tonight than I think I've ever been.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2005, 09:55 PM
MDO67 MDO67 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: On my couch
Posts: 77
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

IMHO, I think you played a bit too passive. A set is a very strong hand. I would reraise the turn and either lead out or check raise the river. More often than not your set will be good here and you want to build the pot.

I haven't read the other replies so I may be totally off base.

- Mark

PS - Missed the TJs !! Oh well.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2005, 10:20 PM
ArturiusX ArturiusX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

[ QUOTE ]
monsters and rivers been coming out from under the bed all night - think maybe its time to roll it up for the night - down more BB tonight than I think I've ever been.

[/ QUOTE ]

Remember, you still had outs vs JT anyway. Board pairing + quads.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2005, 11:24 PM
jokerthief jokerthief is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: thanks for the comments - is this too passive now or correct?

[ QUOTE ]
even tho villan may have TJ for nuts?

[/ QUOTE ]

So what? You're 22 percent to crack that nut if it is there. You have 9 outs for the full house and one for the quads. Your implied odds are damn good as well, if he does have the nuts on the turn, as you will likely go 3-4 bets on the river.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.