first attempt at a PVS at the $55's

[J-Lo]

***** Hand History for Game 2171337301 *****
NL Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:12897272 Level:4 Blinds(50/100) - Tuesday, June 07, 19:40:41 EDT 2005
Table Table 11685 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 3: Hoffa_Burger ( $2215 )
Seat 4: ElliotCarver ( $1950 )
Seat 5: TopNacho ( $1865 )
Seat 7: Gauteng ( $1558 )
Seat 8: booradlye83 ( $1175 )
Seat 9: buginfamous ( $1237 )
Trny:12897272 Level:4
Blinds(50/100)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to booradlye83 [ 7c 6c ]
Hoffa_Burger calls [100].
ElliotCarver calls [100].
TopNacho calls [100].
Gauteng folds.
>You have options at Table 11516 Table!.
booradlye83 is all-In [1125]
buginfamous folds.
Hoffa_Burger folds.
ElliotCarver folds.
TopNacho folds.
booradlye83 does not show cards.
booradlye83 wins 1575 chips
>You have options at Table 11774 Table!.


no real reads-- is my stack to medium sized to be trying this move? Should i wait a level? Are there too many limpers? I thought this was good, becaues i'm afraid of the first limper, the rest i could careless about-- is this a mutated "squeeze play" which harrington speacks about in HOH: V1.?

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
is my stack to medium sized to be trying this move? Should i wait a level?

[/ QUOTE ]

Your stack is fine

[ QUOTE ]

Are there too many limpers?

[/ QUOTE ]

no

[ QUOTE ]

no real reads--

[/ QUOTE ]

This is bad. I really don't like the PVS against readless opponents *especially* with a UTG limp.

You have a great multiway pot hand. I would probably limp behind and try to double up/semibluff if I hit the flop hard without a read. With a read (UTG limps often) then I like the play.