Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:28 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default QQ after a limp reraiser.

#Game No : 2157363231
***** Hand History for Game 2157363231 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12824411 Level:2 Blinds(15/30) - Sunday, June 05, 02:17:48 EDT 2005
Table Table 13969 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 7
Seat 1: denpasar ( $2215 )
Seat 3: Mystakened ( $1850 )
Seat 4: BoyDoby ( $790 )
Seat 5: almostgone ( $1090 )
Seat 6: ACALI77 ( $515 )
Seat 7: Daschwas ( $1200 )
Seat 8: crush_diesel ( $340 )
Trny:12824411 Level:2
Blinds(15/30)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Mystakened [ Qc Qs ]
Daschwas calls [30].
crush_diesel folds.
denpasar calls [30].
Mystakened raises [125].
BoyDoby folds.
>You have options at Table 13850 Table!.
almostgone folds.
ACALI77 folds.
Daschwas calls [95].
>You have options at Table 14884 Table!.
denpasar raises [570].
>You have options at Table 14885 Table!.
Your time bank will become active in less than 20 seconds. If you do not want it to be used, please act now.
>You have options at Table 13850 Table!.
Mystakened is all-In [1725]
Daschwas folds.
denpasar calls [1250].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 6h, 2h, Tc ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 2s ]
** Dealing River ** [ Jd ]

Ok, the guy limped in after another limper and then raised a substantial portion of my stack. I had been raising alot, but I couldnt say my image was loose b/c I had only shown KK.

I couldnt see anybody limping AA or KK behind a limper, so the only hands that made sense were TT, JJ, AK, AQ... Does that make sense to anybody else too?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:45 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

[ QUOTE ]

I couldnt see anybody limping AA or KK behind a limper, so the only hands that made sense were TT, JJ, AK, AQ... Does that make sense to anybody else too?

[/ QUOTE ]
This is incorrect logic. Correct logic is "I have no reads, but my opponents suck enough here to limp reraise with smaller PP's and weak aces I completely pwn."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:58 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

Lol do I really give my opponents too much credit? If he was first to act and limp-reraised me, I think QQ is an easy lay down, esp with the chip stacks that are about to be involved.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2005, 03:13 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

I think you'll be surprised by the crap they turn over in this situation. I have seen limp reraises all-in with suited connectors, because they don't want to lay down. QQ isn't worth folding against only one opponent, no matter how much strength they show, especially at the $22's.

Yeah, I really think your giving your opponents too much credit. The average 2+2er probably has a 30% ROI against the average $22 table, because people will do incredibly stupid things like limp-reraise with 55.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2005, 03:18 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

Maybe you're right on this one.... I guess you only remember the times you have QQ vs AA and KK to a limp-reraise, then the other times they dont and have something else.

The thing that Ive noticed though is bet size. Generally speaking, most players who bet a huge amount of the pot, without going all in, HAVE a hand. When I say HAVE a hand, Im talking about AK, JJ+. Now combine that with the fact that they limped reraised me, and I give them even more credit. Against those hands, QQ is a coinflip. I know, I know, toss in some of those bluffs and it becomes an easy call, which is why I called in this one.

But it just sucks, ya know? When they have AA [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Esp when you both have HUGE chip stacks 1700+
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2005, 04:02 AM
Mr_J Mr_J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 639
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

"The average 2+2er probably has a 30% ROI against the average $22 table"

Highly doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2005, 04:04 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 766
Default Re: QQ after a limp reraiser.

Ok, I was exaggerating. But I'm saying there's a huge difference between the fish at the $22's and decent opposition.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.