Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-26-2002, 11:49 AM
brad brad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,803
Default article on pension changes

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in532435.shtml

as i see it, main thing is pensions dont have to be in seperate account (not part of corp. assets) . can anyone say, bankruptcy, uh oh youre just out of luck?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-26-2002, 12:27 PM
marbles marbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
Posts: 568
Default Re: article on pension changes

"as i see it, main thing is pensions dont have to be in seperate account (not part of corp. assets) . can anyone say, bankruptcy, uh oh youre just out of luck?"
-No, that's not what the article says at all. I would recommend you read it again, but it's a pretty crappy article anyway...

If you want to learn more about the differences between defined contribution and defined benefit plans, you're better off just typing "defined benefit" or "defined contribution" or "cash balance plan" in a google search.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-26-2002, 03:00 PM
brad brad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,803
Default Re: article on pension changes

'Unlike a 401(k) plan, employees neither own the accounts or make investment decisions. Unlike a traditional pension plan, the worker isn't guaranteed annual benefits after retiring.nlike a 401(k) plan, employees neither own the accounts or make investment decisions. '

yeah it is a crappy article
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2002, 04:29 PM
marbles marbles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
Posts: 568
Default Re: article on pension changes

You're right; it is a crappy article. The funny thing is you happened to cite one of the more misleading passages of half-truths in the whole thing.

If I may:

"'Unlike a 401(k) plan, employees neither own the accounts or make investment decisions."
That's true. Of course, the defined benefit plan being replaced was never managed or owned by the individual employees, either. Funny the article doesn't mention that. Were you under the impression that the average Teamster is trading on the portfolio of assets that drive his pension plan?

"Unlike a traditional pension plan, the worker isn't guaranteed annual benefits after retiring."
This is untrue, particularly in the context of the article. At retirement, every Employee is guaranteed the amount in his Cash Balance as defined by the Plan. If the Balance is small, it's because the Assets haven't performed well, not because the company has bills to pay. Further, if an employee had accrued a benefit prior to the conversion, his retirement benefit cannot be lower than the benefit he had previously accrued.

Please, do yourself a favor and learn more about how these things work, and make sure your source is unbiased. Otherwise, you may just bump into an actuary at a cocktail party someday and really look silly in front of everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2002, 09:45 AM
brad brad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,803
Default Re: article on pension changes

ok but if the company goes bankrupt then how do u get your cash balance as defined by the plan?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.