Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2001, 08:03 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Security is going overboard



I hope we all recognize the security madness at the airports for what it is, an empty gesture intended to make us feel better.


Almost all of the new security measures fail to address the specific problem of what happened on the 11th.


Airports have eliminated curbside baggage checks, eliminated check-ins at the gate, and prohibited un-ticketed passengers from accompanying their friends to the gate. Simply put, none of these measures would have prevented Tuesday's events, and they won't prevent another one. So why are they in place?


These are just incredible inconveniences that do very little to make the airplane secure, but they make the passengers feel more secure precisely BECAUSE they've been so inconvenienced.


And in terms of the news rules replacing metal cutlery with plastic, and not allowing nail clippers, nail files, or any kind of pocket knife on board, these are also going to have no effect. There is just no way to prevent passengers from bringing on board something that can be used as a weapon.


There's so many things that can be used as a weapon. What about hot coffee? All things made of glass? I could easily shatter a beer bottle and threaten the pilot with it. What about syringes? A diabetic needs to have his syringes with him. Do we stop all diabetics from flying? What about eyeglass repair kits? Flashlights? A bottle of vodka? A wine corkscrew? A laptop battery? Leather shoelaces? I could use them as a garrot. Poison? I could just poison the coffee and wait for the pilots to take a sip....


What about a really big man? Are we going to prevent big men from flying? All it takes is seven or eight very large muscled 250 pounders with the will to do so and the plane is theirs, with or without weapons.


I could go on and on. If we really believe our planes are going to be hijack-proof because some little old lady wasn't allowed to bring her nail file on board, we're deluding ourselves.


If the FBI is reading this or using Carnivore to monitor this transmission, I am not a terrorist.


natedogg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2001, 08:35 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Security is going overboard



Well, making people feel safe is important. When I walk to my parked car late at night, I feel better seeing a cop on the beat. Maybe he's not paying attention, maybe he runs a 17.2 40 yard dash, maybe he can't hit the side of a barn with his pistol, but A) it makes me feel better; and B) maybe it does discourage some would-be wrong-doers.


How do we all feel about making the cockpit virtually inaccessible? Is it a good idea? Is it do-able?


By the way, I'm in favor of preventing big men from flying, especially in coach.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2001, 09:08 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



I spoke with my brother-in-law who is an airline captain about a few security issues. The cockpit door issue came up. One thing he mentioned is that the door is designed to be broken in an emergency so that people can evacuate through the cockpit in a fire. So for now, just locking it won't do any good. More than procedures will have to change.


P.S. Andy - if you lived in Idaho instead of L.A. you wouldn't have to rely on a cop to feel safe in garages at night. You could make yourself safer with appropriate means. :-)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2001, 10:13 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



Cockpit acces will surely be examined closely. As for other ideas, here's one I haven't read in detail, but which appears to merit consideration:


http://www.skirsch.com/politics/plane/disable.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2001, 10:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Security is going overboard



natedogg-


These were my first thoughts to the new security precautions. None of them would have prevented last Tuesday's tragedy. In fact, air travel has been relatively free of bomb or hijacking incidents in this country for some time. Bottom line: It's difficult at best to prevent people from killing others, if they're willing to lose their own life in the process. This is true for almost any other scenerio. Not just those involving aircraft. Sad, but true.



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2001, 11:34 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



The reason why I feel safer with a cop nearby is because far too many of my fellow Angelinos have made themselves "safer" with "appropriate" means. I have been to Idaho several times and people are much nicer there than here in L.A., not that I'm revealing any state secrets with this information.



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2001, 11:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Interesting



I liked the link. I will try to ask my brother in law about the Airbus fly-by-wire system. He flew Airbuses and has flown 3 different Boeings I think. I remember him complaining about how bad the Airbus system is, but don't know any of the technical details. I will also try to get him to look at the link and see what he says. Some of it sounded technically unrealistic, but I don't know. I know he will approve of guns in the cockpit.


And I'm all for more weapons in the plane. Make me feel like I'm still in Idaho. If they ban carry-ons and give us weapons I'll like flying a lot more. Except the biggest reason to use a club on a fellow passenger will be gone, i.e. the 400 pound lady with 57 plastic bags full of crap purchased at the outlet mall de jour. :-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2001, 11:44 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



Just read through the suggestions from the link, and one would hope many of them will be considered by the FAA and other appropriate government agencies.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2001, 12:02 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not Sure About That



You might be meeting the wrong people in both places. :-) I see people here who give me the creeps as much as many in L.A., but maybe familiarity breeds contempt. But the problem is that the law-abiding Los Angelinos don't take appropriate steps, only the ones who just don't quite care about consequences.


The reality is there are a lot of people who are willing to do you harm wherever you go. And I don't want to sound paranoid, because I have spent enough time in big cities where I am not allowed reasonable steps, and have never had a problem. I haven't had any problems here either. Although there was the night where an armed kidnapper decided to cause some excitement in the middle-of-nowhere casino I play at... But nothing came of it except his arrest.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-18-2001, 02:36 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Not Sure About That



When we checked into our condo in Sun Valley, a person came over to our car, welcomed us, asked us if we needed any help, gave us instructions on where to park, etc. Couldn't have been nicer. (Ditto for the clerk at our motel in Boise.)


My wife said to me, "What was that?" I answered, "That was a person. We don't have many in L.A. We have a-holes."


Having grown up in N.Y. and lived all my adult life in L.A., I am momentarily stunned, as my wife was, when we meet people from more of a small town environment. They're just plain nicer.


There was a famous incident many years ago where a disgruntled looser shot through the windows of a card club in Gardena. The security solution then was to do away with windows in the clubs.



Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.