#1
|
|||
|
|||
instacall?
***** Hand History for Game 2084889591 *****
NL Hold'em $20 Buy-in + $2 Entry Fee Trny:12411601 Level:9 Blinds(300/600) - Saturday, May 21, 21:04:17 EDT 2005 Table Table 13775 (Real Money) Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 4 Seat 5: Reed27 ( $1375 ) Seat 8: rbminn ( $4105 ) Seat 9: bill_fillmaff ( $1240 ) Seat 2: klm45 ( $1280 ) Trny:12411601 Level:9 Blinds(300/600) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to bill_fillmaff [ 3h 3s ] klm45 is all-In [1280] Reed27 folds. >You have options at Table 14011 Table!. rbminn calls [980]. bill_fillmaff folds. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 8s, 7c, 6c ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ 8h ] ** Dealing River ** [ 8c ] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
I'm instafolding the pocket 3's. Are you being serious?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm instafolding the pocket 3's. Are you being serious? [/ QUOTE ] Not me. With blinds 300/600, UTG should be pushing basically any two. You have 2xBB, which doesn't guarantee you much at all at this point. I gamble here, and hope UTG doesn't have a bigger pocket pair. EDIT: I take that back. I didn't see that the player before had called the all-in. I fold as well. I hate reading raw HHs. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
If nobody else had called, I'd almost instacall. With another calling in front, you're dodging 4 overs, or are way behind to a higher pocket pair. Folds McFolderson.
Edit: EXTREMELY good point made by microbet. If you have them both covered, I'd call as well and play for first. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
This sucks, you need 41 more chips. Fold.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
Yeah, if no one else called it is a clear call. I think it is a clear call if you have 41 more chips too.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
Terrible call
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
not to be results oriented but...
klm45 shows [ Ks, Ah ] three of a kind, eights. rbminn shows [ Td, Kc ] three of a kind, eights. klm45 wins 3160 chips from the main pot with three of a kind, eights with ace kicker |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: instacall?
ouch.
|
|
|