Review of Star Wars "Revenge of the Sith" Episode III

wacki · #1 05-16-2005, 05:06 PM

"It sucked less . . . barely."

He goes on to say "What did impress me was the technology used to deliver the images to the silver screen."

[censored], I was so excited about the blood, carnage, and the pic Dynasty posted. [censored] [censored] fuckity [censored] George Lucas is a [censored] monkey.

tdarko · #2 05-16-2005, 05:14 PM

i am too stupid to know what [ QUOTE ]

"It sucked less . . . barely."

[/ QUOTE ] means.

if it barely sucked less than 4,5,6 then it was good but if it sucked barely less than 1,2 then it wasn't very good.

stabn · #3 05-16-2005, 05:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i am too stupid to know what [ QUOTE ]

"It sucked less . . . barely."

[/ QUOTE ] means.

if it barely sucked less than 4,5,6 then it was good but if it sucked barely less than 1,2 then it wasn't very good.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is quite obvious that it does not refer to 4,5,6.

tdarko · #4 05-16-2005, 05:17 PM

i didn't read the article.

daryn · #5 05-16-2005, 05:18 PM

</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
"It sucked less . . . barely."

He goes on to say "What did impress me was the technology used to deliver the images to the silver screen."

[censored], I was so excited about the blood, carnage, and the pic Dynasty posted. [censored] [censored] fuckity [censored] George Lucas is a [censored] monkey.

[/ QUOTE ]

who cares what some clown said about the movie. go see it and make up your own mind. are you really getting pissed about a review? i hate critics and reviewers

wacki · #6 05-16-2005, 05:23 PM

[ QUOTE ]
who cares what some clown said about the movie. go see it and make up your own mind. are you really getting pissed about a review? i hate critics and reviewers

[/ QUOTE ]

Me too. Still this isn't your average "I love the Thin Red Line" movie reviewer. I agree most movie reviewers suck but this review is like Dynasty saying that a Harry Potter flick sucked. This guy has Star Wars screensavers on his computer for crying out loud.

Not good.

But your right, I will probably go and see it anyway. This might be enough for me to wait for the DVD though.

tdarko · #7 05-16-2005, 05:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I agree most movie reviewers suck but this review is like Dynasty saying that a Harry Potter flick sucked. This guy has Star Wars screensavers on his computer for crying out loud.

[/ QUOTE ]
then maybe a normal star wars fan (not so fanatical) would like the movie. sometimes when people know "too much" it ruins the movie for them.

stabn · #8 05-16-2005, 05:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i didn't read the article.

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither did i.

tdarko · #9 05-16-2005, 05:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Neither did i.

[/ QUOTE ]
proof that i am dumb [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Voltron87 · #10 05-16-2005, 05:53 PM

You might think that with the Vader avatar and all I was a huge Star Wars geek but I'm really not.

The first three (4-6) were amazing. They were extremely well done, and had a great feeling to them. So far 1 and 2 have been awful, just awful, so out of place in terms of the originals, they lack all the qualities which people liked about 4-6.

I had my hopes up for this one, sort of, since it has a potential premise to be awesome, but not really given how bad the production and direction has been on the new movies.