#1
|
|||
|
|||
$55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
Background:
15/30 blinds, no reads, everyone has ~1k stacks I'm in mp with some hand (doesnt matter for the topic being discussed). there's 1 limper. i raise to 100. button calls, blinds fold, limper calls. pot= 345 chips flop = 2 8 T (2 tone) and it misses me if i check/fold, i have 900 chips left. if checked to me, i'll make a continuation bet of 1/2 pot (175 chips) and hope to win right there. my stack will be 1245 if i win. but if called, i check/fold if i dont improve. if i lose, i'm down to 725 chips. My reasoning why 725, 900 and 1250 chips are more or less the same: 1) At 25/50 blinds, I have more than 10BB. I'm not going all-in preflop. 2) at 50/100 blinds or higher, I have ~10BB or less. At these blinds levels, i WILL usually make a continuation bet no matter what vs 1 opponent, if i'm the 1st to bet and i raised preflop (LEAK here??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]). at 1250 chips, i raise 250 preflop and my stack is down to 1000. 1 caller. pot is between 500 and 650. continuation bet on flop = 1/2pot = 250 to 325 chips. my stack is now between 750 and 675. i've now committed 40%+ of my stack to this hand. general concenus is that if you are willing to risk 40%+ of your stack, push instead. <font color="red">FLAW IN MY REASONING? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] </font> Do you think there's a difference between 750 and 1250 chips? If so, WHY? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
1. at 750, you still dont have to push PF, but you may to call a push if you're reraised PF...thats why.
2. doubling up has less equity (twice as little) 3. You have less fold equity when blinds increase. not to say you're wrong about continuation bets, but there is a difference between 750 and 1250...should be obvious |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
Furthermore, there's a big difference if you lose a coin-flip with a 500 stack.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
bump
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say
continuation bet?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
2. I don't know if this is a leak or not but I can tell you I rarely do this. When you have a read and the opponent seems weak, fire it out there. As for just planning or having this continuation bet as a normal strategy when the blinds are past level 3 I tend to think this is leakage. I would say after level 1 and 2 I rarely make this bet after missing. Its too many chips to be committing for not enough gain in my opinoin. This may be very weak tight of me but it seems to work out alright. I would be interested to hear what others think as there are times when I could benefit from being more aggressive
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say
[ QUOTE ]
continuation bet? [/ QUOTE ] A bet made on the flop with a missed hand (AK/AQ) after you've raised preflop. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say
[ QUOTE ]
Do you think there's a difference between 750 and 1250 chips? If so, WHY? [/ QUOTE ] Uh, yeah. 500 chips, to be precise. I'm not sure what you're getting at here. You are saying that your raising/calling standards are the same at both stack sizes, when the blinds are low? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
It's really quite simple.
More chips = better. Always. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Is there a difference between 725, 900, and 1250 chips? I say no.
i know what he's getting at...but he's wrong.
He's saying that what you gain by those continuation bets and # of pots you win is NOT outweighed by the times you lose and have 750...overall EV+. I disagree... |
|
|