Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2005, 04:52 AM
Taraz Taraz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 86
Default 10+1 vs. 20+2, Aren\'t they really just the same thing?

I started playing sng's almost exclusively a little while ago starting at the 5+1 level at Party to build a little bit of a bankroll. After about 200 sng's playing 1 or 2 tables at a time I've got an ROI of about 35% and have built my bankroll to about $1000. I realize this is an extremely small sample size, but I'm fairly confident that I can beat those games.

I've tried my hand at about 30 20+2's and while they seemed a little more difficult, the competition didn't seem to be all that different.

With all that said, I was wondering if people think it's a better idea to start seriously multitabling the 10+1's or to move up to the 20+2's if I have the BR. I want to move up, but I think it may be more lucrative for me to just stay down and 4-table instead of play one or two 20's at a time. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2005, 04:55 AM
Apathy Apathy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: 10+1 vs. 20+2, Aren\'t they really just the same thing?

Move up. You are confident, having winning stats and an adequate bankroll. I'm willing to bet you could make more 2 tabling the 20's then 4 tabling the 10's. Play the 20s until you feel more confident then think about 4 tabling or moving up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.