#1
|
|||
|
|||
Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
My bad if someone already posted about this, I looked around and didn't see it.
Yeah so my friend told me about this player yesterday. He played against her in an sng. Now before everyone goes nuts on me for conspiracy theories, hear me out. This player plays step 5 and 6 WSOP $2000 buy ins all the time, like 3 or 4 often at once. I was really skeptical about it being a bot, after all it has to be incredibly hard. But basically, she never talks, and only goes all in or folds every time. Often takes until almost her timer runs out. I saw her *win* this particular sng with the following hands, basically one after another (where she obviously has the worst hand). All in preflop either call or puts herself all in: QT vs KQ 99 vs KK 83s vs AK A6s vs KK K6 vs K7 She basically put out 3 people in a row and won with those last hands in maybe like 7 hands. I suppose its *possible* to win in those situations 3 times in a row, but what's more important was that she voluntarily put herself all in each time. She's *dominated* in bascially all those situations. And no, they weren't steals or "it's only an extra blind" situations. The whole time the entire table was debating about whether or not she's a bot. All I'm saying is watch out. I dunno what the deal is, and how she's still playing without someone reporting her. Edit: Forgot to mention, she's on party. If you don't believe me, watch an sng yourself... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
If those hands happened ITM ure an idiot.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
Only the winner gets a WSOP seat. The next two get step 6 entries.
This is the WSOP step 6 NL 2000+150 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
I played this sng, I only misplayed(IMO) the first hand.
KQ vs AT vs JJ(won)called an all-in( Im the leakiest player ever) J6 vs AK( lost)steal attempt 73 vs AK(lost)pot odds K6 vs AQ(won) steal attempt T6 vs K4( won) steal attempt(ITM) QT vs A9(won)heads-up, I pushed he called. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
why would a bot want a WSOP entry?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
think about this for like half a second then you will figure it out [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] oh, and btw, gamboholic isnt a bot. holla
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
If you look right now, people are talking about her right now. She plays like 20 hours a day, 3 or 4 tables at once sometimes.
The bot doesnt want the entry, the person who made it does. Are you retarded? Your play wasnt like hers. Hers were all ins, against much more dominating hands... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
"She plays like 20 hours a day"
Highly doubt that. " or 4 tables at once sometimes." So what. I play 6. Plenty of people play 8. Raptor is trying (succeeding??) 12. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
Gamboholic isn't a bot and your conspiracy theory sucks.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Really sketchy player, gamboholic_
mmmm....well Jimmy isnt very good at poker, Jimmy created a bot to win at poker, Jimmys bot is really good, Jimmy can win 10K but instead Jimmy prefers to play a poker tourney, Jimmy arrives at vegas, Jimmy sits down at the table, Jimmy realizes hes not good at poker, doh!.
|
|
|