Early results.... I Stink

[Gk123]

After my 1st 55 sit and goes at the $55 level here are my numbers....pls help me

ROI -%27
ITM "

1st:6
2nd:2
3rd:4
4th:13
5th:4
6th:9
7th:7
8th:4
9th:4
10th:1

[kevstreet]

If you have the bank roll, check back after 445 more SnGs.

Needless to say this sample is much too small to make any assumptions, but it seems you may need to work on your bubble play.

[Jman28]

[ QUOTE ]
If you have the bank roll, check back after 445 more SnGs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just because he can afford it doesn't mean he should play the game. If he's a losing player, which it is too early to tell, then he should drop down buy-ins.

-Jman28

[Cleveland Guy]

[ QUOTE ]
If you have the bank roll, check back after 445 more SnGs.

Needless to say this sample is much too small to make any assumptions, but it seems you may need to work on your bubble play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Post some bubble hands

your in the top 4 50% of the time, but your 4th shouldn't be equal to your 1-3rds combined.

[mackthefork]

[ QUOTE ]
If you have the bank roll, check back after 445 more SnGs.

Needless to say this sample is much too small to make any assumptions, but it seems you may need to work on your bubble play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Am I the only one sick of sample size snobs [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. It is a small sample but then its a fairly big -ROI figure too, I would drop to the 10s or 20s and play a few hundred of whatever level you choose and see how it pans out, posting hands will help people give you more relevant advice than statistic will.

Also I have noticed a recent influx of weak-tight advice on here lately, come back JStrasser all is forgiven [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].

Regards Mack

[kevstreet]

[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one sick of sample size snobs...

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not trying to be a snob in any way, just hard to do analyzation on 45 tournaments. I did however point out there may be a leak in his bubble play based on what he has provided. You yourself said to check back after a few hundred, that's basically what I said!

[mackthefork]

Either way he needs to seriously analyse his bubble play to see if he is unlucky, too tight, too loose or whatever, posting some hands which are not bad beats will be a promising start. 55s are a tough place to start off IMO.

Mack

[apd138]

You do stink.

[kevstreet]

[ QUOTE ]
Either way he needs to seriously analyse his bubble play to see if he is unlucky, too tight, too loose or whatever, posting some hands which are not bad beats will be a promising start. 55s are a tough place to start off IMO. Mack

[/ QUOTE ]

I completely agree.

[Scuba Chuck]

My advice is to move down a level, minimally.