Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2005, 10:37 PM
JMBills JMBills is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 35
Default Hand with aggression / hand-reading questions

I've been at this table for about 15 hands and I've noticed there're a few loose players and a few tight players. I'm still edgy about dealing with tight-aggressive players.

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero caps</font>, Button calls.

I haven't seen the Button take down any pots or show down any cards before this.
I somewhat regretted capping preflop instantly, because I cannot narrow down what my opponent has at all.

Flop: (9.50 SB) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises</font>, Hero calls.

I hit my king, so I bet, but the button isn't scared by that at all. There're two clubs on the board, I think, perhaps he has AK of clubs. I'll admit I didn't 3-bet because I was plain baffled / scared of what the opponent might have to beat me (the possibilities seemed limitless).

Question 1: Heads-up is this a 3-bet opportunity?

Turn: (6.75 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, Button checks.

After the button checked, I thought: Ooook so he just successfully used a free-card play on me, now I am nearly 100% sure he is on a flush draw.

Question 2: 3 to a straight on board, 2-flush, I have top pair best kicker still. Had he bet, should I have folded? Should I have bet out here?

River: (6.75 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

The final flush card hit and I know I'm beat, but I called out of stubbornness to know what this opponent was playing so aggressively with preflop/on the flop-- and it wasn't what I thought it was.


Against passive players I have a pretty high level of confidence but against aggression I start to lose track of what my opponents could have and miss some angles.

I'd appreciate any input on this particular situation and generalizations, this is what I would consider a marginal situation worth posting, but if it's the same old drill and I'm just too dumb to realize it, my bad.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2005, 10:50 PM
UncleSalty UncleSalty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Composing Vogon poetry
Posts: 513
Default Re: Hand with aggression / hand-reading questions

I think this is a classic opportunity to apply the clarkmeister theorum. You are HU, OOP, and the 4th flush card just hit the river. If I am correct you should bet the river and fold to a raise.

However, I'm a little confused by whether Clarkmeister applies when the hand was already HU on the flop. Betting the flop HU should indicate to the villain that you're not on a flush draw, so I don't know if it's considered correct to bet the river in this case.

Can anyone clarify here?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2005, 10:58 PM
zuluking zuluking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 148
Default Re: Hand with aggression / hand-reading questions

This is a .50/1 hand that you are over-analyzing too much.

I would 3-bet the flop, call his cap and bet out on the turn. If he raises the turn, I would check/call the river UNLESS the 4th club hit (which it did here) then I would bet out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2005, 11:02 PM
JMBills JMBills is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 35
Default Don\'t think this is Clarkmeister\'s Theorum

Clarkmeister's Theorum is for a four-flush board, this is a 3-flush board. I did say that the "final flush card hit" which, upon retrospect, clearly illustrates my incorrect, weak-tight line of thinking that I'm trying to correct.

I was thinking: Suddenly, I'm heads-up, so every mistake I make is more profound than if there're a bunch of weaker players in the hand too.

When you're heads-up with somebody, the chances of them having a drawing hand is actually less than betting into a field of 4 and getting only a single call on a flop like this though, right? So 3-betting makes even more sense.

My short-handed play is sorely lacking in general, looking back at my post again I feel like a complete tard for not playing that more aggressively. Of course top pair is strong heads-up...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2005, 11:06 PM
TripleH68 TripleH68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 390
Default Re: Hand with aggression / hand-reading questions

3-bet the flop and lead the turn. If villain raises the turn, then slow down.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2005, 11:07 PM
zuluking zuluking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 148
Default Re: Don\'t think this is Clarkmeister\'s Theorum

[ QUOTE ]
Clarkmeister's Theorum is for a four-flush board, this is a 3-flush board.

[/ QUOTE ]

Holy $hit Batman! I gotta quit the beers tonight. sorry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.