Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:08 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default a probability brainteaser from OOT

help me y'all,

I'm either doing something wrong or explaining something wrong.


answer in this thread
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:22 PM
probman probman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

After quickly reading through the thread it seems that most people converged to the correct answer of 1/3. The argument you provide it the standard one given for this rather famous problem.

There is usually a second part. Now if the mother instead answers that her eldest child is a girl, does change the probability? Yes, the probability of the younger child being a girl is 1/2 not 1/3 as in the previous case. This is generally referred to as the census takers problem.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:28 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

did you see the 1% stipulation?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2005, 06:00 PM
Gator Gator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41
Default How\'s this for an approach

Take an average hand (say Q8u) and figure the probability for having the nuts for that hand. It may not extrapolate perfectly to having the nuts for any hand, but it may be close. So, what's the probability of ending up with a flop that is the nuts for q8u?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-17-2005, 06:04 PM
probman probman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

The 1% stipulation comes from assuming a finite population size, n, with n/2 men and n/2 women. If n is small then the non-replacement effect you mentioned is significant. However, as n grows large this effect becomes insignificant, i.e. much less than 1%.

One should note that the above model for the populations is very inaccurate. A better model is to assume that at every birth there is a 1/2 probability of a boy and a 1/2 probability of a girl. Under this model, the replacement effect is wiped out since we are drawing from a stationary distribution.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:01 PM
AnyTwoCanLose AnyTwoCanLose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 110
Default Huh? Tell me what I\'m missing...

How could it possibly matter what the girl's name is?

The probability is 1/3... right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:15 PM
jason_t jason_t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Another downswing?
Posts: 2,274
Default Re: Huh? Tell me what I\'m missing...

[ QUOTE ]
How could it possibly matter what the girl's name is?

The probability is 1/3... right?

[/ QUOTE ]

A women is more likely to have a girl named Sarah if she has two girls. Conversely, if he she has a child named Sarah....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:43 PM
Bobby Digital Bobby Digital is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

Someone please explain how the first answer is 1/3. The woman has two children, on of them IS a girl. This only leaves one other child, which is either a boy or girl. The chances of having a boy or a girl are equally likely. Therefore shoudn't the answer be 1/2.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:51 PM
jason_t jason_t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Another downswing?
Posts: 2,274
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

[ QUOTE ]

Someone please explain how the first answer is 1/3. The woman has two children, on of them IS a girl. This only leaves one other child, which is either a boy or girl. The chances of having a boy or a girl are equally likely. Therefore shoudn't the answer be 1/2.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are three possibilities, all of which are distinct and equally likely.

G,B
B,G
G,G.

So the answer is 1/3.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:56 PM
Bobby Digital Bobby Digital is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: a probability brainteaser from OOT

Ok, but if she has at least one girl B,G and G,B are exactly the same. The one that isn't a girl, is a boy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.