|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Overall, how highly do you rate this book | |||
| Very bad. |
   
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Bad. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| OK. |
  
|
5 | 50.00% |
| Good. |
  
|
3 | 30.00% |
| Very Good. |
  
|
1 | 10.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
03-13-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
What is the difference between the first two choices?
Also, this poll is retarded. He cannot solve the beal theorem 
|
|
#4
03-13-2005, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
[ QUOTE ]
I thought it was kinda funny. Only on this board do people have no sense of humour. [/ QUOTE ] lol, oops! well i guess it looks like the joke was on me then. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#6
03-13-2005, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
Tha Andy Beal Theorem?
I didn't know the guy was smart enough to have a Theorem named after himself. Unless he had it commissioned... TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
|
#7
03-13-2005, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
|
|
#9
03-13-2005, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
is this theorem referring to triangles or just a2+b2=c2 in general?
please forgive me if this is an incredibly stupid question
|
|
#10
03-13-2005, 09:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poll = Could David Sklansky solve the Beal Theorem??
No, this would be based on fermat's last theorem of
ax + bx = cx there is no x where x>2 this is a branch conjecture of: ax + by = cz there are no a,b,c and x,y,z that do not have a common factor. But is the Beal that came up with this, the same Beal that plays poker??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
