Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2005, 10:10 PM
skipperbob skipperbob is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Default Stats vs. Outcome

I have an ongoing dialogue with a frequent poster (quite a knowledgeable fellow; but a mean drunk) which concerns his obsession with statistical analyses of poker outcomes. It is my opinion that the only stat that has ANY meaning is bankroll. His position (once the chaf is separated from the chaf) seems to be that without stats, poker conversations are meaningless......How do y'all come down on the issue? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2005, 10:17 PM
The Armchair The Armchair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 251
Default Re: Stats vs. Outcome

I think you're both right. At the end of the day, all that matters is $/hr. However, if you get really lucky, sit down at a $200 NL, post a live blind and get 27o, push, and come up against pocket 2s and pocket 7s, what does it tell you if you backdoor a flush?

If that was your only $200, and you suddenly have like $650, great. But we cannot construct anything meaningful from the event.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2005, 10:34 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: Stats vs. Outcome

[ QUOTE ]
I have an ongoing dialogue with a frequent poster (quite a knowledgeable fellow; but a mean drunk) which concerns his obsession with statistical analyses of poker outcomes. It is my opinion that the only stat that has ANY meaning is bankroll.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have to narrow down what you mean by "stat" here. This could be a reasonable position or it could be truly ridiculous depending on what you're calling a "stat."

eastbay
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2005, 02:29 AM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: Stats vs. Outcome

[ QUOTE ]
I have an ongoing dialogue with a frequent poster (quite a knowledgeable fellow; but a mean drunk) which concerns his obsession with statistical analyses of poker outcomes. It is my opinion that the only stat that has ANY meaning is bankroll. His position (once the chaf is separated from the chaf) seems to be that without stats, poker conversations are meaningless......How do y'all come down on the issue? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think you believe yourself, skipper. Let's use the money test. Two players approach you for backing:

A) Has 2500 SNGs logged at the $33 level with a 40% ITM and 24% ROI playing 8 tables at a time. He wants you to back him with a 5K bankroll, because his risk of ruin with that bankroll would be less than 1/2 of 1%.

B) Doesn't believe in stats. All he knows is that he is murdering the Steps and is up over 30K in 2 months. He owes some people money, but doesn't want to be out of the action. He wants 5K also, but will give you 10% more juice than whatever player A wants from you.

Who would you bankroll? Unless you'd say player B, the mean drunk might have a point.

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.