Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2005, 06:00 AM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Fantabulous table. Best I've been at in a week.

Button, SB and BB are each LP-P
UTG is TP-P

So, as we all have experienced countless times before, the interplay between protecting your hand and pumping the pot is what it's all about.

Did I misplay this?

I am especially interested in the thought process involved in the flop and turn decisions so please explain why you act in the manner that you proscribe.

Anyone pop the river, here?

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: (5 SB) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, BB calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls, SB calls, BB calls.

Turn: (6.50 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, BB calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero caps</font>, SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls.

River: (22.50 BB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, UTG folds, Hero calls, SB calls.

Final Pot: 28.50 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2005, 12:47 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

shamelssly, he bumps
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2005, 12:59 PM
Grease Grease is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Haverford
Posts: 273
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

The BB check raising sucks, but you made the right play by betting and calling. 3-betting would have been spewing. I like it. Follow the SB and BB around. Waiting until the turn to pop it is ok, since they were so loose.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2005, 01:45 PM
jskills jskills is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in your Mom
Posts: 769
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

I like the way you played every street. The only exception is why not reraise the flop? I guess you wanted to keep the blinds in the hand? If they're coming along for 2 bets they probably will for 3 right?

It's the only spot you didn't have the pedal to the metal, which is the only place you can question your play (particularly if you did not take it down).

The turn cap is fine. I would also bet/call the river as you did.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2005, 02:54 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

[ QUOTE ]
I like the way you played every street. The only exception is why not reraise the flop? I guess you wanted to keep the blinds in the hand? If they're coming along for 2 bets they probably will for 3 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Re-raising the flop makes the blinds face 2 SBs and is not just "one more" bet, as you imply. In any case, I would like other opinions on the flop/turn/river play, please.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2005, 03:37 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

I don't cap the turn. What do you put Tight/Passive on that limped UTG, check-raised to trap multiple players on the flop and is now 3-betting the turn? Not only do I think you're behind most of the time here, I'm not really sure which of your outs are good.


[ QUOTE ]

Anyone pop the river, here?


[/ QUOTE ]

You mean re-raise? That would be extremely unwise.

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2005, 04:09 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

[ QUOTE ]
I don't cap the turn. What do you put Tight/Passive on that limped UTG, check-raised to trap multiple players on the flop and is now 3-betting the turn? Not only do I think you're behind most of the time here, I'm not really sure which of your outs are good.


[ QUOTE ]

Anyone pop the river, here?


[/ QUOTE ]

You mean re-raise? That would be extremely unwise.

/mc

[/ QUOTE ]

Monty-

So you put UTG on, specifically, 66? IF so, then, yep, I'm drawing to 1 out, but I am not capable of making that read.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:20 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

[ QUOTE ]

So you put UTG on, specifically, 66?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. But given your read on this player 66 seems like his most likely hand.

He could also have KK that missed a pre-flop l/rr. He could have I guess he maybe could have A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] but why no raise UTG? He could maybe have K6 and be neither tight nor passive? I don't see 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3-betting the turn, but maybe? Maybe he's not so tight after all and has a straight?

After he 3-bet the turn what range of hands did you put him on?

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:32 PM
me454555 me454555 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 566
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

Just pump the flop. Theres no reason to want to eliminate people from this hand by waiting for the turn to raise. You have such a strong hand you don't mind people coming along. Just remember, your 2:1 to fill up by the river.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2005, 05:47 PM
molawn2mo molawn2mo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Default Re: Set vs. Multiple LP-Ps - Classic Matchup

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

So you put UTG on, specifically, 66?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. But given your read on this player 66 seems like his most likely hand.

He could also have KK that missed a pre-flop l/rr. He could have I guess he maybe could have A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] but why no raise UTG? He could maybe have K6 and be neither tight nor passive? I don't see 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3-betting the turn, but maybe? Maybe he's not so tight after all and has a straight?

After he 3-bet the turn what range of hands did you put him on?

/mc

[/ QUOTE ]

I confess, I did not put him on a specific hand but, rather, saw any of the entire field as drawing to a flushie. Yes, there could be a set over set situation but I was unconcerned (my bad). My concern was, specifically, how best to protect against the flushie drawers while at the same time plowing as much into the pot as I could. I chose to minimize the pot size on the flop (and reduce the drawing odds) and pump the turn. That was the plan, flawed as it may have been. Was it flawed? That is the question.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.